Actually she DOES know. She's fully aware of what the document says, what it's authors intended and how her actions violate her oath and the law as prescribed by the constitution. That means she can offer NO credible defense for her conduct when she and others just like her are brought to trial for treason and then hanged publicly. Once a few dozen of these criminals are strung up as proof that they are not immune to the consequences of their illegal conduct the rest will slink into their caves and holes and will need to be ferreted out, tried and hung. Public hanging is the ONLY acceptable punishment for such traitorous conduct.
One thing is for certain... she's due to be replaced with a new model... 20+ years in congress is too long. This is why we need term limits without exception. Entrenched idealouges like her who think they know better than the founding fathers and can nanny us into submission. I agree with Dan. They have to wait to really employ thier European socialist government fully; after they confiscate our "assult" weapons. Notice she called them military assualt weapons (in reference to her understanding the law, constitution and other lies)... which clearly are not. Read his bio and tell me who is more qualified to speak about anything constitutional? Ted Cruz Bio- Before being elected, Ted received national acclaim as the Solicitor General of Texas, the State’s chief lawyer before the U.S. Supreme Court. Serving under Attorney General Greg Abbott, Ted was the nation’s youngest Solicitor General, the longest serving Solicitor General in Texas, and the first Hispanic Solicitor General of Texas.
In private practice in Houston, Ted spent five years as a partner at one of the nation’s largest law firms, where he led the firm’s U.S. Supreme Court and national Appellate Litigation practice.
Ted has authored more than 80 U.S. Supreme Court briefs and argued 43 oral arguments, including nine before the U.S. Supreme Court. During Ted’s service as Solicitor General, Texas achieved an unprecedented series of landmark national victories, including successfully defending:
•U.S. sovereignty against the UN and the World Court in Medellin v. Texas; •the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms; •the constitutionality of the Texas Ten Commandments monument; •the constitutionality of the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance; •the constitutionality of the Texas Sexually Violent Predator Civil Commitment law; and •the Texas congressional redistricting plan. The National Law Journal has called Ted “a key voice” to whom “the [U.S. Supreme Court] Justices listen.” Ted has been named by American Lawyer magazine as one of the 50 Best Litigators under 45 in America, by the National Law Journal as one of the 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America, and by Texas Lawyer as one of the 25 Greatest Texas Lawyers of the Past Quarter Century.
From 2004-09, he taught U.S. Supreme Court Litigation as an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Texas School of Law.
Prior to becoming Solicitor General, he served as the Director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission, as Associate Deputy Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice, and as Domestic Policy Advisor on the 2000 Bush-Cheney campaign.
And you will all notice that the "senior senator" did not, at any time, even approach the general zip code of a possible answer to Senator Cruz's question. The business of the Congress is to pass law, true. But it is not their business to pass laws that have to be brought up to SCOTUS to be proven constitutional. They should be doing that BEFORE they even put it up to a vote. Traitorous hag faced bitch!
When Diane Shitstain told Cruz that the gun ban would not violate the second amendment because there were x number of guns exempt, he should have told her, "Alrighty, then! Let's ban Senators from California. No one's rights will be abridged, because there will be 98 other Senators who are not banned." Same difference.
Actually she DOES know. She's fully aware of what the document says, what it's authors intended and how her actions violate her oath and the law as prescribed by the constitution.
ReplyDeleteThat means she can offer NO credible defense for her conduct when she and others just like her are brought to trial for treason and then hanged publicly. Once a few dozen of these
criminals are strung up as proof that they are not immune to the consequences of their
illegal conduct the rest will slink into their caves and holes and will need to be ferreted out, tried and hung. Public hanging is the ONLY acceptable punishment for such traitorous conduct.
The only constitution that useless sack of excrement knows is the one in her addled head. The one that talks about rainbows and unicorns and shit.
ReplyDeleteStupid bint.
Feinstein like many other politicians are like baby Robins "ALL MOUTH AND FULL OF SHIT"!
ReplyDeleteOne thing is for certain... she's due to be replaced with a new model... 20+ years in congress is too long. This is why we need term limits without exception. Entrenched idealouges like her who think they know better than the founding fathers and can nanny us into submission. I agree with Dan. They have to wait to really employ thier European socialist government fully; after they confiscate our "assult" weapons. Notice she called them military assualt weapons (in reference to her understanding the law, constitution and other lies)... which clearly are not. Read his bio and tell me who is more qualified to speak about anything constitutional?
ReplyDeleteTed Cruz Bio- Before being elected, Ted received national acclaim as the Solicitor General of Texas, the State’s chief lawyer before the U.S. Supreme Court. Serving under Attorney General Greg Abbott, Ted was the nation’s youngest Solicitor General, the longest serving Solicitor General in Texas, and the first Hispanic Solicitor General of Texas.
In private practice in Houston, Ted spent five years as a partner at one of the nation’s largest law firms, where he led the firm’s U.S. Supreme Court and national Appellate Litigation practice.
Ted has authored more than 80 U.S. Supreme Court briefs and argued 43 oral arguments, including nine before the U.S. Supreme Court. During Ted’s service as Solicitor General, Texas achieved an unprecedented series of landmark national victories, including successfully defending:
•U.S. sovereignty against the UN and the World Court in Medellin v. Texas;
•the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms;
•the constitutionality of the Texas Ten Commandments monument;
•the constitutionality of the words “under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance;
•the constitutionality of the Texas Sexually Violent Predator Civil Commitment law; and
•the Texas congressional redistricting plan.
The National Law Journal has called Ted “a key voice” to whom “the [U.S. Supreme Court] Justices listen.” Ted has been named by American Lawyer magazine as one of the 50 Best Litigators under 45 in America, by the National Law Journal as one of the 50 Most Influential Minority Lawyers in America, and by Texas Lawyer as one of the 25 Greatest Texas Lawyers of the Past Quarter Century.
From 2004-09, he taught U.S. Supreme Court Litigation as an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of Texas School of Law.
Prior to becoming Solicitor General, he served as the Director of the Office of Policy Planning at the Federal Trade Commission, as Associate Deputy Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice, and as Domestic Policy Advisor on the 2000 Bush-Cheney campaign.
Traitor bitch.
ReplyDeleteAnd she has been a commie for 40 years.
ReplyDeleteAnd you will all notice that the "senior senator" did not, at any time, even approach the general zip code of a possible answer to Senator Cruz's question. The business of the Congress is to pass law, true. But it is not their business to pass laws that have to be brought up to SCOTUS to be proven constitutional. They should be doing that BEFORE they even put it up to a vote. Traitorous hag faced bitch!
ReplyDeleteWhen Diane Shitstain told Cruz that the gun ban would not violate the second amendment because there were x number of guns exempt, he should have told her, "Alrighty, then! Let's ban Senators from California. No one's rights will be abridged, because there will be 98 other Senators who are not banned." Same difference.
ReplyDelete