“Do you accept the verdict of the New York jury that found Donald Trump guilty on all 34 counts?”
That will be the question asked of every Republican from now until the presidential election in November, and if Republicans don’t know how to answer, they will look like idiots, which is exactly what the left-leaning media wants.
Need to phrase that much more clearly. How about "do you AGREE with the verdict" or even better "Was DJT unfairly prosecuted?" or "Was DJTs prosecution politically driven?" One may ACCEPT the verdict (it was reached by following the form of the law, however bad the jury instructions or regardless of whether there was actually a crime to charge), because in fact the jury reached that verdict. It's a fact they did; it must be accepted. It need not be AGREED WITH. The jury reached that verdict, but were wrong to do so, it was a wrongful and fraudulent prosecution, and has no bearing on DJTs fitness for the presidency.
A true old school journalist\reporter would do just that, but they all died out a couple of decades ago if not longer. They know what they are asking since they know the answer they want\need.
I know some nitwits who believe Trump is guilty of felonies and should serve time even though they have no idea what the felonies are. You can't imagine how many of these emotionally reacting, instant gratification assholes exist.
That's silly, "explain things to them." Like they don't know. Do like they do and answer the question you want. like "I expected nothing else from such a corrupt court."
These idiots still can't say what he's supposedly guilty of. "NDA's" or "Non-Disclosure agreements" are common in business, and that' what this was, so where's the crime?
My answer: Fuck no you communist bastards!
ReplyDeleteFDT
DeleteNeed to phrase that much more clearly. How about "do you AGREE with the verdict" or even better "Was DJT unfairly prosecuted?" or "Was DJTs prosecution politically driven?" One may ACCEPT the verdict (it was reached by following the form of the law, however bad the jury instructions or regardless of whether there was actually a crime to charge), because in fact the jury reached that verdict. It's a fact they did; it must be accepted. It need not be AGREED WITH. The jury reached that verdict, but were wrong to do so, it was a wrongful and fraudulent prosecution, and has no bearing on DJTs fitness for the presidency.
ReplyDeleteA true old school journalist\reporter would do just that, but they all died out a couple of decades ago if not longer. They know what they are asking since they know the answer they want\need.
DeleteI know some nitwits who believe Trump is guilty of felonies and should serve time even though they have no idea what the felonies are. You can't imagine how many of these emotionally reacting, instant gratification assholes exist.
ReplyDeleteIf they can't think logically, logic means nothing to them
DeleteThat's silly, "explain things to them." Like they don't know. Do like they do and answer the question you want. like "I expected nothing else from such a corrupt court."
ReplyDeleteNo.
ReplyDeletei wish djt could at least acknowledge j6ers and ashli
ReplyDeleteI do my best to stay as far away from idiots as possible so no one is going to be asking me that question.... Heaven help them if they do.
ReplyDeleteJD
These idiots still can't say what he's supposedly guilty of. "NDA's" or "Non-Disclosure agreements" are common in business, and that' what this was, so where's the crime?
ReplyDelete