The bill would expand the discretion currently granted judges in statutory rape cases and was promoted as bringing fairness under the law to LGBTQ defendants.
The current law, in place for decades, permits judges to decide whether a man should be placed on California’s sex offender registry if he had voluntary intercourse with someone 14 to 17 years old and was no more than 10 years older than the person.
MORE
*****
I'm sorry, but I have never heard of the 'current law' described in the 3rd paragraph. Matter of fact, I can remember reading numerous accounts of men over 21 having to register after being busted with their minor girlfriends.
Regardless, this is just outrageous. Now a 24 year old man can legally molest a 14 year old kid?
Commiefornia legalized queer grooming. They call it "consenting" but after they rape a young boy they tell them all sorts of bad things will happen if they say it wasn't "consenting".
ReplyDeleteThey created open season on young boys by these fags.
I thought they already did away with only 2 genders? How will they determine it's a 'man'? Another lawyers wet dream.
ReplyDeleteSMOD can not come soon enough.
Jerry
Giselle Maxwell is spilling her guts. Gotta get out in front the fallout....
ReplyDeleteThe 'P' for Joe Biden or Pedophile Of The United States, POTUS for short, will be added to the nation's gender alphabet next year.
ReplyDeleteYet another example of the abject criminality of thought coming out of the Demonrat party.
ReplyDeleteNemo
"Now a 24 year old man can legally molest a 14 year old kid?"
ReplyDeleteNo. That is not what this is saying. Currently, if the chomo has vaginal intercourse with a minor aged 14-17 and is not more than 10 years older the judge has the option to not require the chomo to register as a sex offender on the List. The LBTQXYZ community got it's panties in a wad saying that was discriminating against them since they prefer to bugger little boys. So they are amending the law to allow the judge the same leeway to not require the homosexual chomo to register as a sex offender.
So now, the chomos still have to go to jail, but the judge has the option of not forcing them to register on the List.
Instead of removing the discretion of the judge in hetero cases, which is what should have happened, they are giving the freedom in LBGQTXYZ cases.
Take it for what it is worth, but here is the California Police Chief Association had to say:
“Despite misinformation, this bill does not legalize ANY crime against a child – SB 145 still maintains the SAME criminal punishments under current law,” the association tweeted.
“Despite misinformation, this bill does not legalize ANY crime against a child".
DeleteBaby steps. That comes next.
Fucking somebody that's not even old enough to get a learner's permit isn't a crime?
DeleteHell, politicians have been fucking people who aren't even conceived, let alone born, for hundreds of years now.
DeleteThe bill does not legalize sex with kids. It gives the judge latitude to decide whether the offender goes on the sex offender registry. It treats straights and gays the same. Now how will it be applied in practice? Who knows and it could be abused.
ReplyDeleteIt's California, so you can just as well say it will be abused. Especially when considering the low life pedos who introduced it.
DeleteIf anyone wonders what the democrats want it is this and every other perverted thing you can imagine.
ReplyDeleteBaby steps is right. Baby steps toward making pedophilia legal...hasn't that been the real goal behind the LGBTQrst movement?
ReplyDelete