Pages


Thursday, December 03, 2020

More California counties ratchet up measures amid surge

SAN FRANCISCO — More counties in California announced new COVID-19 restrictions on Saturday to prevent rising caseloads from spiraling into a hospital crisis. 

San Francisco is joining a statewide curfew and Silicon Valley is banning all high school, collegiate and professional sports and imposing a quarantine for those traveling into the region from more than 150 miles away. Santa Clara County has the highest case rate in the Bay Area, leading to the stricter rules, said Santa Clara County Health Officer Dr. Sara Cody. 

10 comments:

  1. They actually think we are that stoopid, in that every damned day they parrot the "new record number of cases" BS. Of course it's a new record, as you just tested more people. And wrongly calling positive tests "cases" just gives us another slap in the face.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My gut telling me they want civil war to gain power. Ratcheting up the rage and inaugurating hiden will raise the level metric phuktons

      Delete
  2. Such horseshit. The Plandemic virus has a 99.7% survival rate. Ask yourselves why TPTB are locking everything down again despite their "winning" the Election? It is because they are scared AF of what's about to happen nationwide. They stole the Election, we know it, they know it, and they know that we know it. The only step remaining to save the country is the cartridge box. THAT is why the new wave of lockdowns is happening.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Will, I have it right now and it's the real deal. Life is really sucking right now but I'm gonna pull through

      Delete
  3. How can a common cold be a hospital crisis?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Can anyone confirm where the test kits are actually manufactured? China, perhaps? I'd like to see a batch of brand new test kits tested themselves. I suspect most would test positive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Peaowed,
      Most of the current tests use a generic swab and then they either swab your throat or nasal passage. These are not like the first generation tests coming out of china.

      The swab then goes to a PCR machine which replicates the particles and increases the quantity through a set number of cycles. If at the end of the cycles the count is below the threshold you get a negative result and if its over the threshold you get a positive result. Seems simple except its flawed.

      The scientist who invented the PCR process has come out against its use in viral testing as it gives excessive false positives.

      Additionally the Portugese supreme court looked at the process and found that at 35 cycles - which is what the WU, USA and Canada use; that only 3% of positives wete real. Ie 97% of positives are false positives.

      They based that in a recent report on false positives.
      https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa1491/5912603
      Below is a quote from a court case that summarized the report.

      “if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”


      I take this to mean that if you times the posted numbers of new 'cases' by 0.03 you would have a better idea of the truth.

      Exile1981

      Delete
    2. To add to that, my son has a B.S. in biology. I was talking about the PCR tests being unreliable and he mentioned he was familiar with them. He did PCR work when doing DNA matching in school. (he stopped watching the news, bad for his blood pressure) I said that anything over 30 cycles was most likely not infectious and his reply was "They're using 30 cycles? That's ridiculous!" When I told them they actually use 40 he rolled his eyes and said "That's insane".
      A good illustration of the cycle thing is the little math problem I learned in elementary school. If you had just a penny, and doubled your money every day, how much would you have at the end of a month. To spare you the trouble, you would have over 1,000,000,000 pennies. At the end 40 days (cycles), you would have 1,000,000,000,000 pennies. So, every base pair in the sample turns into 1 trillion after 40 cycles. They are not looking for the whole virus, only certain fragments, which could come from any number of viruses. After 40 cycles even a single fragment is now detectable, or "positive". It's a scam, pure and simple.
      Cheers.

      Delete
  5. Look, lets face it .... we are stupid! Else they would not do this to us. (us = us + them)
    We saw this coming many moons ago and what did we do? big FAT NOTHING!
    We have become great at complaining, blaming and claiming money from the feds while ordering crap from amazon, WM ... etc and watching Netflix.
    We complain about our election yet we did the same to others since 1953. (Ajax is no longer a conspiracy theory, granted it was a coup)

    ReplyDelete
  6. There is no 'surge'. One commenter saw a 'news' story about the surge that caused a hospital to set up a tent on the lawn. He drove over and watched the canopy (not a tent) for a long time. Empty, not in use.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.