The coronavirus vaccine is not a vaccine, it is an injection of these contents, but these do not include graphene oxide. None of the sources I found admitted the inclusion of graphene oxide. If graphene oxide is actually in the injection and not listed or addressed in documentation about the contents, it is a crime against humanity. It’s a violation of the Nuremburg Codes and subject to like punishment, i.e., the Gods of Gravity. NIH explains the benefits of graphene oxide (GO) in this article in February of 2016. So, the idea that graphene oxide would not be considered to deliver the mRNA is ridiculous. And Pfizer with it’s record of accountability suggests otherwise.
Call me a conspiracy theory nut job all you want. To me it is obvious that there is some truly satanic evil comic book villain level shit going on. They can stick their vaccine in their ass.
ReplyDeleteThe medical illilteracy in this one is strong. Been using mRNA vaccine in vet medicine for decades now. The science is quite settled. But trying to convince people that everything they read on the internet is like trying to convince the same people that 911 wasn't an inside job, the building collapse in Florida wasn't an implosion and Bruce Jenner still ain't a woman.
ReplyDeleteIn the late 70's the Swine Flu vaccine was shut down after fewer than 5 people died from it. In the early 80's the Bird Flu vaccine was shut down after fewer that 50 people died from it. Thousands have died directly from the COVID (non) vaccine. The most effective treatment at the onset of COVID is Ivermectin (google Goa and Ivermectin) but that is prohibited.
DeleteThere is no question that Graphene dioxide is present in all versions of the (non) vaccine.
Don't talk to me about the science being settled. Refute this https://everydayconcerned.net/2021/07/24/crime-scene-vaccine-nano-graphene-oxide-in-high-amounts-now-found-in-moderna-other-vaccines-also-sanofi-flu-vaccine-saline-solution-point-to-covid-19-all-professed-variants-being-graphene/
When you are done with that I can give you about 20 other highly respected Doctors who have the same, similar or confirming experience. Many of them have published peer reviewed papers on the (non) vaccine injuries which are now according to VAERS near 500K, many of those life altering.
Nothing is settled other than the governments desire to kill as many people as possible.
Been using mRNA vaccines in veterinary medicines for decades, huh? So name them, what do they immunize against, when were they introduced, and who manufactures them.
DeleteHere's a very simple question on the science of the vaccine. Exactly how many people have to die from the vaccine before the program is stopped? Dont evade. Just give a number.
DeletePurevax rabies vaccines. Merial (Now BI). You're welcome. You really don't want to argue this with me. I majored in immunology before I went to med school and well, let's just say I have a very clear understanding as apposed to the Google Doctors all over the place. And for anonymous above your post. Know what they call the person that graduated last in their class? Doctor. Better do you homework on the people you take advice from.
Deletethen why does moderna's own published data show all nine times they tried mrna vax for corona the test subjects, cats, died upon re-exposure to the virus?
DeletePurevax rabies vaccine is a modified live version of canary pox. It is not mRNA instructions to the patients cells to mimic a virus and trigger an immune response. You should get a refund on your degree since you don't even seem to understand the fundamentals.
DeleteYou said you've been using mrna vaccines (as in more than one type of mrna vaccine for decades). You've mentioned one that was introdeuced within the last ten years. That doesn't exactly count as decades, or multiple types of mrna vaccines, that comprises your experience, does it. And majoring in an undergraduate biology program isn't exactly rocket science, pal, so don't be too full of yourself.
DeleteFuck the jab.
ReplyDeleteWe need to get vaccinated because the masks don't work and we have to keep wearing the masks because the vaccine doesn't either. I think that sums up current govt. policy.
ReplyDeleteI will not take it either.
ReplyDeletehttps://rumble.com/vkfz1v-the-vaccine-causes-the-virus-to-be-more-dangerous.html
This from the mRNA inventor.
Joe
Just went to the VA hospital last week. If the doc had said one more god damned thing about the shot I was about to ask what part of fuck no did she not understand. Thank god my wife was there or I would a showed my ass big time. The bitch even tried scare tactics. Saying she had people on ventilators saying, I wish I had listened. Pissed me off. Covid is dangerous, so's getting fucking shot at ya stupid bitch.
ReplyDeleteMy cardiologist tried the same dumb shit last week, blah blah blah about hospitalizations and people dieing. I asked, because he has resendency at the local hospital, how many patients are strictly covid, how many on ventilation and what's the survival rate of the virus. He finally looks at my girlfriend like she's going to save him and I tell him I make my decisions not her so look at me. Fuck him
DeleteJD
I would have asked for a referral to a Dr. that isn't a tool.
DeleteI've got a couple apptmt's at VA the end of next month. I'm expecting the same kinds of fear speeches when I go. My reply is going to be "What part of NO don't you understand?"
DeleteEvery time i go to the VA a doc ask me and i told them and will keep telling them NO!!!grayman
DeleteOne of the ingredients is polyethylene glycol. Doing a search on that chemical asking if it's poisonous returns "Based on the common assumption that polyethylene glycol (PEG) is non-toxic, our local regulatory authorities recently recommended the use of PEG instead. However, mice injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) with PEG 200 at a dose of 8 mL/kg (i.e. 9 g/kg) did not tolerate PEG 200 well, and half of the animals had to be euthanized."
ReplyDeletePEG is a compound that has a base compound of glycol, the main ingredient in anti-freeze. Would you like to have anti freeze injected into your body in ANY AMOUNT?
Nemo
PEG is put in campers water tanks and used as antifreeze in things that people consume. It's also an ingredient in many food products. It's good, you're fine. There's a huge difference between PEG and EG. It's all science folks.
DeletePolyethylene Glycol: commonly used as a Laxative.
DeleteWhen ya gotta go...
That is a little under a quart of PEG for a 250# person to reach a LD50.
DeleteI dont want any either, but I can think of a lot of stuff that dangerous or more.
In use for Decades? What nonsense! Even NPR says this is the first time. And the need for EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) means it hasn't had 2 years of testing, much less decades.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.npr.org/2020/12/16/947184202/the-science-behind-the-historic-mrna-vaccine
If it was REALLY a life saving shot , we couldn't afford it , the fact that they are not only offering it at no charge , but also throwing in incentives tells me to avoid the faucci ouchie at all costs
ReplyDeleteThis one has been doing the rounds; I've seen it elsewhere. It's a real piece of crackpottery. Let's see ...
ReplyDelete"The coronavirus vaccine is not a vaccine"
- irrelevant hairsplitting posing as an important point
"it is an injection of these contents, but these do not include graphene oxide. None of the sources I found admitted the inclusion of graphene oxide."
- So, according to everyone who might actually know, it doesn't include graphene oxide. By the way, a very little pointing and clicking on your search engine of choice will reveal graphene oxide isn't a single substance but a whole class of materials with varying properties. Someone may have skipped doing the most trivial of research ...
"If" - here we go - "graphene oxide is actually in the injection ...[frothing rant about how terrible that is]"
- You have to wonder whether some pro-vax group is hawking that lot around the blogs, then pointing it out to their friends and going 'look what those stupid anti-vax people are saying'.
[and so on and so forth]
- That stuff is about as crazy (not as actually dangerous, mind you) as the politicians who tell us not taking the vaccine means we want to kill Granny and keep the world locked up forever.
No it's not hairsplitting. It's not a vaccine by WHO updated definitions from 2018. Riddle me this : if the virus is real (and I'm not saying it isn't) then why don't we have standard culture-derived vaccines rather than these experimental (in reality) nRNA shots?
ReplyDeleteAs for GO you are correct as far as they're being a range of products. In fact the carbon nanotube product offshoot shows tremendous medical potential especially with thrombosis (oh the irony). However GO is generally considered toxic. Then there's the physical structure (shape) and it's potential for cellular damage, the inability of the immune system to effectively clear GO out of your system etc. I wouldn't want GO in my system!
It's often quoted that these vaxxes are in breach of the Nuremberg code due to their experimental nature. As they've been widely released under emergency use authorisation you have no claim. Otherwise they'd be in breach of about 10 sections. However,depending on your country, any attempt at coerced or forced vaccination will be in breach of numerous international laws on human freedom.
You mean a definition of vaccines from before a time when mRNA vaccines even existed outside a lab doesn't include them? Wow! I'm convinced. Not.
DeleteYeah Larry, somebody had to redefine the term so as to be "inclusive". Do you know what they called vaccines before the first vaccine was invented? Why not use the same concept in law? It wasn't a riot, it was a "peaceful protest".
DeleteAll y'all can call it want you want but here is one accepted definition of a vaccine:
ReplyDelete"A vaccine is a suspension of weakened, killed, or fragmented microorganisms or toxins or of antibodies or lymphocytes that is administered primarily to prevent disease."
Maybe one can make a case for the current jabs to contain “toxins” to justify their position. Go for it. As for me, I'm somewhat stuck on the idea a true vaccine is the dead virus, more or less.
Now before someone starts whining, no, this is not the only definition. It would be total idiocy NOT to redefine the term to include new technologies under any circumstances. However, in traditional terms of the original definition, one can absolutely say this is not a vaccine.
That said, my objection to this viral frenzy reaches far beyond this. If this jab is so universally wonderful, why should anyone be forced to take it? Consequently, if you are vaccinated, what are you afraid of? Mutants? Please.
"The science is settled" has to be one of the most dumbass statements in modern times. Where did I first hear it? Oh. Yeah. It was in reference to "Climate Change". The science is settled there too. You want to talk about science? Let's consider some of the "FDA approved" shit now subject to massive class action lawsuits. Zantac, for one, comes to mind. Originally it FDA approved by prescription only. Then it was deemed so "safe" it was approved to be purchased over the counter. Oops! Not any more! Couldn't one say the science was “quite settled” on Zantac also? Zantac is an oral pharmaceutical that went through rigorous testing to meet FDA standards. These current “vaccines” were approved for emergency use, bypassing standard testing. They have not gone through the usual rigorous testing required of other pharmaceuticals. I've seen one claim that Hydroxychloroquine met so much resistance because one of the requirements for emergency approval of the jab was the lack of any effective treatment. While I have no data to either support or dismiss this contention, it would be interesting to see a comparison of what was known about both approaches at the time of said approval. There is little if any data concerning the long term affects of this jab. Most of what I've seen is negative, including death and heart issues. I prefer to wait at least until the first 10-year is completed.
More...
What about the science surrounding Covid testing? Now we can ascertain why there were so few cases of influenza reported last year - the tests could not distinguish between Covid or the flu. This blunder throws everything off. Nobody can say with a straight face how many cases of Covid there actually were, much less how many died of Covid. What is apparent is many of those who did die had one or more medical conditions making them more susceptible to complications. Let's not forget the questions arising from deaths attributed to the virus whether valid or not. What is NOT apparent is when and how these people were treated. I am reasonably certain a good number of these were not treated with medications we now know are effected.
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of effective treatments... why are these not brought up with anywhere near the regularity of vaccines? Personally, I believe those who have been infected and survived are much better equipped to battle this virus than those who are vaccinated. Since we have effective treatments, shouldn't it be my choice as to whether to take my chances?
Am I, did I, take this vaccine? It is nobody's business but my own. All I'm saying there are enough questions needing answers to justify anyone who is hesitant without resorting to “conspiracy theories” or raising doubts about 9/11. Nobody needs to imply that citizens who object to this regime forcing us peons to submit to their decrees, much less question or even refrain from getting jabbed.
Unfortunately, not all of us are as learned as some of the more esteemed regulars of this blog. All we can do is ask questions and try to find good answers. Of course, then we have to run these by the powers that be to ensure said answers meet the approval of the proper authorities. Either that or just STFU, kneel down and take the jab(s) like good little subjects.