This report is a part of "Rethinking Gun Violence," an ABC News series examining the level of gun violence in the U.S. -- and what can be done about it.
While taxing guns or ammunition may not prevent malicious actors from accessing them, some policymakers and advocates say this approach could raise revenue to fund lifesaving violence prevention programs and help offset the the $280 billion annual price tag of gun violence in America.
The Real level of "Gun violence" or the level portrayed by the media propaganda machine ?
ReplyDeleteThis idea has been around since even before the Clinton days. And even back then we compared to the old Jim Crow poll taxes. It was a deliberate fee to reduce access to your rights.
ReplyDeleteFirearms and ammo are already hit with a 10% Federal tax, the FAET, and state sales tax. So much for not being taxes in order to exercise a Constitutional right.
ReplyDeleteThey don't just want to tax us, they want to keep us from buying parts.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.yahoo.com/news/ghost-guns-firearm-kits-bought-125616223.html
Gun violence costs $280 billion a year? Bullshit. Show me the spreadsheet.
ReplyDelete1 billion for medical costs, 2 billion for prison costs, 277 billion in lawyers fees
DeleteI'm simply amazed... yeah, I'm not giving these assholes any ideas. The headline is close enough.
ReplyDeletechillhill
"After a year that saw a record-high 21 million gun sales (revealed by data on background checks) and record-high gun deaths (34,274 in 2021 alone, per Gun Violence Archive data)..."
ReplyDelete"Correlation is not causation."
I have a solution for ending "gun violence", how about ending raising children without a father in their lives instead of the current fashion of absent fathers and "baby daddy's". I remember a time when the most fear inducing phrase a mother could utter to a misbehaving child was: "Just you wait till your father gets home". I also remember having male teachers who were WW II vets. I don't know of any school shooting back then.
ReplyDeleteOr, you know, speaking purely hypothetically, we could oh...say deport about 20% of 13% of the population and have all violent crime, including "gun violence" be eviscerated virtually overnight. But that's just crazy talk.
ReplyDeleteOne can take this in a least two ways:
ReplyDeleteLike anything else the controllers don't like - tax it out of existence. Even the courts are ruling this as an affront to the 2A.
Or it could simply be a matter of making law-abiding citizens pay for the acts of criminals
The funny thing is any money raised will go into the general fund "for the children" just like all the other targeted taxes. NOT for gun violence victims which includes gangbangers
ReplyDelete