Pages


Tuesday, May 24, 2022

Because It Worked Well In Chicago:

Lawmakers from Illinois last week introduced bicameral legislation on Capitol Hill that would make unlicensed gun possession illegal. 

The move, billed as a way to stomp out gun crime, doesn't target gun criminals. Instead, the Blair Holt Firearm Licensing and Record of Sale Act would outlaw unlicensed firearm ownership and the transfer of firearms without such a government-issued permit, then direct the U.S. Attorney General to create a federal registry for sales tied to fingerprint-based nationwide criminal background checks.
-Alemaster

10 comments:

  1. In 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed the Firearms Owners’ Protection Act into law. Among other things, the law prohibited a national gun registry.[16]

    So, how are they going to get around that?

    Nemo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Selective amnesia.

      Delete
    2. Don't worry, big tech has all the data already and is surely going to give it to big brother whenever they are asked for it.

      Jackdaddy63

      Delete
    3. And what of the Second Amendment Sanctuary states? They are likely to ignore the requirements of that bill should it pass. What are the chances of passage? Not good by any means.

      Delete
  2. Add an amendment to the bill requiring background checks and fingerprints for voting.
    Steve in CA

    ReplyDelete
  3. does this mean I have to register my staple gun, caulking guns, hot glue gun, etc?

    ReplyDelete
  4. You f***wits in Illinois aren't too smart, are you? How about any prohibited person caught with a firearm is sentenced to 10 years in prison, and a $100,000 fine. Anyone who uses a firearm in the commission of a crime (even a misdemeanor) is sentenced to 100 years in prison, with no parole, and the Governor is prohibited from issuing a pardon or commutation. If a business owner, or any other citizen has to draw a firearm to defend themselves from a felon, the person committing the felony gets the 100 year sentence. Anyone participating in the commission of a felony where any one (or more) of the participants has a firearm in their possession, all get charged (like the felony murder rule, except a felony firearm possession rule). Any DA who refuses to prosecute such a case is sentenced to 50 years, no parole, no possibility of a pardon or commutation, and a $1 million dollar fine (all mandatory). Neither race, sex, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, political affiliation, mental state, or level of inebriation can be considered as mitigating factors in such cases.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Derp. Government is evil and wants to deprive you of your rights....so uh...let's give them the power to imprison you for life and destroy human beings because government is so...uh...amazing.

      I'm sorry, you were doing 56 in a 55, and I see you own a gun. Do you have it on you?
      Yes.
      Ok, so you committed a misdemeanor while in possession of a firearm. No trial. Go directly to jail. For 100 years. You wordless piece of sh*t.

      Yeah. Derp harder man.

      Delete
    2. Well, Anonymous fuckwit, you aren't much on reading comprehension, are you? Read it again. I didn't say commit a misdemeanor while in possession, I said USING a firearm in the commission of a felony or misdemeanor. Having a firearm in your vehicle and going 56 in a 55 is not using a firearm in the commission of a felony. Fuckwits like you, who want to make excuses for habitual criminal dirtbags is part of the reason why we're in the shape we're in. Fucking learn to read, and comprehend what you read.

      Delete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.