Pages


Friday, June 03, 2022

No Duty to Protect

The May 24 massacre in Uvalde, Texas, outrages the conscience, though not for the facile and stupid reasons spewed by every prominent Democratic Party politician, half-witted newspaper columnist, and vapid television talking-head.

Liberals and other simpering dunderheads make fetishes of objects, focusing on the tool rather than the tool’s misuser. “Nobody needs an AR-15,” goes the refrain, when need has nothing and right has everything to do with it. “But the tool is so easy to misuse and abuse!” comes the ovine rebuttal, when we know as a matter of fact the tool is used in a small fraction of violent crimes.  

Unfortunately, it so happens that some of those crimes focus the attention of the entire nation. 

3 comments:

  1. All L.E.O. involved should have there names and faces posted, and labeled as cowards and murdering accomplices never to be employed by anyone, left to the streets forever

    ReplyDelete
  2. Every one of those coward cops better spend the rest of their lives watching their six after they're fired and made to forfeit their pensions.

    Nemo

    ReplyDelete
  3. Go do a search for Warren v. District of Columbia. LEO's have not/never been under requirement to protect neither Jack, Jill nor Shit.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.