State Dept vows Nord Stream 2 will be a ‘hunk of metal at bottom of the ocean’ if Russia invades Ukraine
The State Department on Thursday unequivocally warned that if Russia invades Ukraine the Nord Stream 2 pipeline will sit unused at the bottom of the ocean.
By Caitlin McFall
Updated Jan. 27, 2022 08:24 PM
-WiscoDave
The winter shivering and starvation across Europe is come to America.
ReplyDeleteFor the wicked globalists, America must be destroyed for she is strength and prosperity.
Bidens mansion in California has lots of warm rooms and the sun is always shining at the fake White House.
DeleteSo, what the hell are they going to do this winter if Russia unilatterally withdraws from Ukraine and writes a check for the damage? Nordstream II will still not transfer gas?
DeletePutin did it... lololololololol.
ReplyDeleteThey don't realize we all know its just clownworld, so they keep clowning along.
How so? Because Europe will be the benefactor of America's iil and foodstuffs in the America Last pogrom.
ReplyDeleteI was confused bt Tucker Carlsons show the other night, showing a big plume of gas bubbling up in the ocean and he was carrying on about the damage that gas was doing; but then the press corps lady said neither one was in use yet. So what was all the gas?
ReplyDeleteThe gas is there to keep the line functional and pressurized over water pressure.
DeleteThis is a definite US action to keep Germany in line, and prevent suing for peace in the Ukraine, exposing our bio labs in the Ukraine.
Blackmail all around with a side dish of graft and corruption.
Our government has sold our great grand children into slavery.
Steve in Ky
There are 4 lines each of 48in diametrt with 41mm wall thickness. Two lines are nordstream 1 and the other two are NS 2. The first explosion ruptured one of the lines in NS 2 and the next blast the following morning ruptured both lines of NS 1.
DeleteThe lines were not flowing but were pressurized with gas. Its common practice to keep a line full for ease of restarting and it prevents oxygen from causing corrosion.
Now if you plan to leave it idle for months you could nitrogen purge it.
Exile1981
The pipes were filled with product to keep it pressurized for additional structural integrity. Sitting empty at 6 atmospheres puts a lot of pressure on the pipes. So does filling them with sea water, although not the same way… Eod1sg Ret
ReplyDeleteWith all the US air activity over the sabotage site....
ReplyDeleteand the USS Kersage Amphibious Ready Group in the area....
I smell some rats...PedoJoe46 and our DOD need to explain some things.
Ed357
Putin blew up the pipelines for reasons and anyone who believes otherwise is a retard who it too fucking stupid to breathe. So sayeth Aesop
ReplyDeleteAesop has never wrong-just ask him; he'll prove to you that everyone else is just too stupid to understand, then he'll triple down.
DeleteWe all bow to aesops superior intelligence.
DeleteMac
Aesop crawfished on his earlier post and has now linked to LawDog's post on the subject.
DeleteNO WAY!!! Aesop actually admitted he may be wrong??? Get out of here!!!
DeleteAs the Angels blast their trumpets, the Lord smiles.
Here is another take on the pipeline, if you have never looked at his blog check out his stories. "The LawDog files" he is a great storyteller with an interesting past! https://thelawdogfiles.com/
ReplyDeleteBottom line: no one knows who did it. There have been US and Russian ships in the area before or during the incident. To say the Russian didn't do it ascribes characteristics to them they have not demonstrated in Ukraine. To say the US did it, ascribes to the US regime a competence that hasn't been demonstrated in many, many things. Who did it is not known now and all we have is what we used to call RumInt in the military.
ReplyDeleteNo faith in the SEALs?
Deletethen too, they could have contracted the job out to a PMC ?
ReplyDeletethose guys know how to keep their mouth shut about what they do.
kind of funny how no one has even talked about that now ?
Russia did it to make it look like the US did it. If so.eonw threatens to burn your house down and then you do it, who is going to get the blame?
ReplyDelete