Pages


Friday, October 28, 2022

It's About Power

I recently got into a spat with some old college buddies over Alex Jones. Regardless of your opinion of the outcome of his recent case—a massive judgement against him for calling the parents of children murdered in the Sandy Hook shooting crisis actors—it was disheartening to see my otherwise news-skeptical friends agree with the media narrative: “Crush the hateful conspiracy theorist nut-job.” 

12 comments:

  1. Even when there's just 2 people interacting power comes into play. Even in the most "compatible" couple there's a "top & a bottom". It's human nature. Humans are motivated by gaining control with power..

    ReplyDelete
  2. “Crush the hateful conspiracy theorist nut-job.”

    Like Hillary denying the 2016 election????????????

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sandy Hook is as clean as the 2020 election. Questionable AF.
    Ever see the crime scene photos? The bodies? No? Yet so sure it happened.
    Photos and evidence would have been better for gun control nuts.
    But, no.
    Psyop brings $trillions judgement.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm a conservative libertarian and would probably agree some of Alex Jone's thoughts but he does the right no favors with this tragic shooting and I thought he was very wrong in this instance. However, the verdict amount is absurd and yes, they are trying to take away free speech with such ridiculous awards. In short, tough all the way around!

    ReplyDelete
  5. The settlement over the poison gas leak in Bhopol India was $470 million, with 574,000 victims.

    The settlement ordered for Alex Jones is $978 million, with great hopes for historic civil penalties, due mainly to hurt feelings.

    Something is wrong with this picture.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awards that high are designed to shut the rest of us up. Seemed to me the fix was in before the trial started and this whole thing was not exactly kosher.

      Delete
    2. And how many executives paid any fines or jail time during the financial collapse of 2008 resulting in trillions loss? Kareem Serageldin. just this one.

      Delete
  6. Moopa here - Well, precedence has been set and the message is "The Right Leaning Must Beware". I've been down the Sandy Hook rabbit hole, searched and searched for firsthand evidence and there isn't anything that has convinced me Alex was wrong about there being actors, From the chief law enforcement officer through the coroner and funeral director. I watched hours of news reels and studied the film and photos of that time. Listened to interviews & statements from everyone allowed to speak. The oddest thing I found was no restoration or hazmat team was ever dispatched or hired to clean the school. Yet, Alex on the hook for "Horrible Lies" ... right, sure ... everything is nothing but theater nowadays

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree! There's too much evidence that shows this was a simulation, that the powers that be, decided to fabricate an incident that never happened. And all the "families" of the "victims" were quite probably paid quite well to keep pretending the lie. And now they're getting a bonus! Trust nothing in today's climate of total deception to the public.

      Delete
    2. I studied it when it first came out, myself, and found that there were some unanswered questions. Such as pictures of other places that had been released before the shooting, that had the same kids marching in lines, in front of other schools.
      I can't say that they prove anything, they might be fakes, but they do raise doubt.

      Delete
  7. The people that jump to defend children "cuz da children" are usually the useless. Seeing all the data of young men & women being maimed and now the elites having infants in their targets where are these warriors that champion children? They're usually on FB, IG, Twitter or at a sports event creaming over their 40 yr old idol.

    ReplyDelete
  8. What I see many comments missing here was his right to declare his belief of innocence during the trial. He was absolutely not allowed to utter those words or use the name Hillary Clinton as well as the prosecutor was never required to accompany reason or law to each and every objection. The judge stated she would fill in the blanks later for him.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.