Friday, June 09, 2023
The Case for Secession
There’s an odd dichotomy among the right. The TNVOWOOT crowd, who clearly and openly recognize that voting is not the solution to anything also seem stuck within the broken framework, refusing to recognize that secession is the only possible solution for states seeking a life boat from the titanic of the United States. Many of them believe that there’ll be a civil war, but they envision one of arms and tactics and strategy, but I think it’s even broader than that and would probably stem from secession, but only if that is possible, otherwise it’ll be a slow winnowing down of resistance by one means or another. I’m sure Biden’s crew has a lot of good ideas on how to do that.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Ain't gonna be a Civil War or secession Globalists & Democrats are shrewd enough and obsessed enough to allow the citizenry to have just enough toys like cars, cellphones, sports and Social Media jousting to keep them complacent while they employ distractions like Race, Sexual orientation and Economics to keep people fighting each other and ignorant of the destruction of the Republican party, the Constitution and American culture. The Progressives play the strategic long waiting game while the peasants are indulging in bread and circus instant-gratification.
ReplyDeleteI think you overestimate them. They’re just too greedy now, they want to enter their sick utopia now.
Delete"Separate your state from affiliation with the federal government of the United States"
ReplyDeleteWhen you agrre to obey the rules of those that call you "enemy", you have already surrendered.
There is ONLY The United States... singular. The Right Holy Constitution, as readable only by The United States Supreme Pharisees, says so -- so The Pharisees say.
If you renounce the colonial rule of The United States, where they draw lines on just a piece of paper, doesn't matter.
Someone once asked an interesting question: who is the final arbitrator of the US Constitution?
DeleteThe incorrect answer (which I gave) was "The US Supreme Court."
The correct answer is the US Constitution.
How about an amendment that States can leave the US only to join the New Republic of the United States. This is legal, no fighting to leave, no claim from the old US need be acknowledged. The New Republic would follow the tennants of the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights but can immediately add new rules like Term Limits, The Federal Government is subservent to the States Rights which is Subservant to the Individual/citizen (not illegal trespassers). No tax of the individual citizen or his property (just like the Constitution says) and probably most important defiinitions of the words used in the documents so there is no "utternaces from the prenumbra" or claiming it is a 'living document"
ReplyDeleteAnd add to the 2nd Amendment this phrase "And this time we mean it!" while getting rid of that unfortunate first part of the 2A that allows turds to play fast and loose with the 2A.
DeleteThere won't and can't be ANY secession as it was ruled illegal in 1869 by the Supreme Court (Texas vs White). It'll be civil war 2 by the looks of it...
ReplyDeleteThat's why I keep saying, don't call it "secession." Like India and Pakistan in 1947, call it a partition.
ReplyDeleteIn a country full of blowhards and pussies, we shall die the slow death.
ReplyDeleteWe tried the "secession" route once. Look what that got us. Anyone thinking it will be any different this time is an abject moron. "We the people" have two choices. Neither pleasant.
ReplyDeleteSubmit and embrace slavery or fight....and by fight I don't mean voting.
10 million conservatives move to Canada.
ReplyDeleteWith the 35 million there roughly divided at 50% liberal and 50% conservative............we own it.
Dump the current goons and start again with a conservative government.
THEN... flyover country notices what we've got up there and vote to.......just leave and join us.
Let the coastal elites do what ever they want. We will control the oil and the food.
Everything can be worked out except Quebec.
Fuck Quebec. Take their land and send their froggy asses back to France, Trudeau first.
Canadian liberals will always be welcomed to the coastal liberal enclaves further enhancing the new alliance.
AND... we need to re-asses this abortion issue.
If liberals want to continue to eliminate their offspring before they're born, who are we to interfere?
The other problem with this line of thinking is that in many states, it is only the major metropolitan areas that are leftist, the rural areas are generally conservative. We need to separate these leftist cities from the rest of the state and force them to be city-states and negotiate with the parts of the states\country that provide almost everything they need to survive.
ReplyDeleteGood point. When California was talking secession in 2017,they kept acting like the states border was sacrosanct. It isn't. At the time, California should have been split into East and West with East taking all the food production and staying with the US.
DeleteCity-states -- any of their 'laws' are only enforceable inside their city-limits.
ReplyDeleteLeave decent folk be.
.
Until recently, 'these united states of America' was our proper name... emphasis on 'states' as supreme over the federal government agents.
.
The RulingParasites are inbred twits.
They rule through inertia and ownership of:
* MainStreamMedia
* the mints printing fiat currency.
.
.
An aside:
I am half convinced this planet is a simulation.
I am other half convinced this planet is a game-show for an invisible audience.
Umm , ask the Koreans how succession has worked there... FYI there is no more new land, continent to go to unless we take it from another. Why would, should we cede precious area to socialists and communists? There is more land under socialists and communists rule than America. We do not need to be added to those lists. But those people with the lists should be allowed to pick another place that aligns with their dictator style of governance.
ReplyDelete