Tattoo artists than that do portraits are few and far between. Much better off using some kind of symbolism for your loved one. Besides, tats also fade and stretch with time. Not sure how you’d cover up this monstrosity.
You've got to admit, the tattoo 'artist' didn't have much to work with. But looking on the bright side, this is one tattoo that might actually improve with age.
Well that's dumb, unless you are only going to date/marry women with the same name you never, ever, tattoo a woman's name anywhere on your body.... Also only an idiot would permanently mark their body with the likeness of someone else ... JD
Like most women, the further away she is, the better she looks.....
ReplyDeleteTattoo artists than that do portraits are few and far between. Much better off using some kind of symbolism for your loved one. Besides, tats also fade and stretch with time. Not sure how you’d cover up this monstrosity.
ReplyDeleteMidwest Chick
Also, you tend to get what you pay for.
DeleteUgly and stupid. That's my view of tattoos.
ReplyDeleteEmergency bra rack in the background
ReplyDeleteGive credit where credit is due. Got the teef right.
ReplyDeleteThat looks methed up.
ReplyDeleteCC
If that's true of the guy receiving the tattoo, he probably thinks it looks terrific.
DeleteYou've got to admit, the tattoo 'artist' didn't have much to work with.
ReplyDeleteBut looking on the bright side, this is one tattoo that might actually improve with age.
Well that's dumb, unless you are only going to date/marry women with the same name you never, ever, tattoo a woman's name anywhere on your body.... Also only an idiot would permanently mark their body with the likeness of someone else ...
ReplyDeleteJD
I think the tattoo version of her looks better than the photo and the tat is pretty bad.
ReplyDelete