Over the summer, President Joe Biden announced a new program that aims to deploy $42 billion to get “every person in America” online by 2030. The Broadband Equity Access and Deployment (BEAD) Program was designed to bridge the digital divide and states are currently working on plans to distribute these funds.
*****
Sorry Joe, but I've gone more than 3 days without the internet. Let's see you try that with water.
Going without CNN for three days will be the end of leftist indoctrination.
ReplyDeleteI was sure Joe would say the internet was just as important as getting the Covid vaccine shot.
ReplyDeleteCant move to an only digital currency and digital ID if everyone does not have internet.
ReplyDeleteHell, Kenny, we've both gone more than forty years without the internet. I'm still standing. Eod1sg Ret
ReplyDeleteCan't they just just the unlimited data on their Obama phones?
ReplyDeleteNo thanks. I've seen what you've done with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and National Public Radio.
ReplyDeleteHey if we can take the money being laundered in Ukraine and Israel and put it towards the American citizens I would probably be in favor of it...... Unfortunately we know our government doesn't give a shit about its citizens
ReplyDeleteJD
Part of the plan for digital currency...
ReplyDeleteMost votes evah.
ReplyDeleteGottDAMM! I hate the term 'digital divide'. It's only a reason to hand out mobile devices to negroes. Remember 'obama phones'? FFS, you need the interwebs, go to the library. It's free. Or better yet, deny yourself a few packs of newports and get a used laptop. Free wifi is everywhere.
ReplyDeleteBTW, have you ever read the detail of your mobile bill? Look at the line item called 'universal access fund'. It's a decent size bite that you are paying. Last time I looked, it was like 10% of the bill. That's the slush fund that they are SUPPOSED to be using for this bullshit.
But they don't. Like gas taxes. $.50 out of every gallon to drive over pot holed roads.
like everything else they do to 'help' , it will be a boondoggle, opposite of what it's titled, double the proposed cost for what could have been done for a fraction of the cost if it was truely necessary in the first place
ReplyDelete