Pages


Friday, July 19, 2024

20 percent ‘very confident’ Secret Service can protect presidential candidates from harm

(The Hill) – A fifth of Americans said they have a lot of confidence in the Secret Service to protect presidential candidates from harm, according to a new poll conducted after the attempted assassination of former President Trump at a campaign rally.
MORE

18 comments:

  1. They sure look spiffy in their suits and ties on top of the bulletproof vests.
    The gurlz need bigger holsters, though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The gurlz need to get back in the kitchen.

      Delete
    2. I prefer my cock holster tight and well lubricated.... And better looking than what these liberal skanks are.

      Delete
  2. I think Trump should poach some Mossad agents for,his security team because the current crop of D E Idiots aren’t worth the powder to blow them up

    ReplyDelete
  3. I watched the Trump Rally via TV and saw the shooting. To me the Secret Service was not operating good. I looked at the area via multiple videos and articles. The Secret Service should have had a Sniper on the Water Tower behind the roof the shooter fired from as the Tower had clear view of the whole area. At a minimum there should have been a Secret Service person on the roof of the shooter. The DEI Secret Service Director changed personnel to make it easy for an attack on Trump. This to me looked planned and likely someone else may have been helping the shooter.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I am very confident that they can protect the prefered candidate of the PTB and NWO......

    ReplyDelete
  5. That's a big percent right after they failed the latest test... just goes to show you that some people never learn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No surprise there; almost half of the people in the country are ready to vote for FJB again.

      Delete
  6. These are the same 20% you will find at the very very bottom of the IQ bell curve.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Something-something Pareto Principle mumble-mumble 20% completely retarded whisper-whisper Third World...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Look at the obviously successful TV commercials and you'll realize that 20% is 4 times too low. Having said that at least the commercials are DEI complaint.

    ReplyDelete
  9. When I saw him go down. As in out of sight behind the podium. I thought where to hell is security? They claim they were on him immediatly. Bullshit. Many seconds went by and he was down on the floor alone. Those seconds can be an eternity. Believe me I know. If memory serves my M-16 would dump 21 rounds in three seconds.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Over half the alleged SS agents were homeland security investigators.Worthless pukes. Maybe when Trump gets back in he will return the favor to pedo joe , obozo and the clintons.

    ReplyDelete
  11. As you all may or may not know, the United Sates Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal was tasked by the United States Secret Service with performing all bomb sweeps for the President, Vice President and Foreign Heads of State visiting the USA in 1967. That protection also fell to candidates for those offices that qualified for matching funds. I spent a great deal of my career on protective details for folks like Carter, Reagan, Bush senior, Ford and Clinton, as well as the Pope and candidates like Mondale and Jackson. It didn't matter who the protectee was, the object was they ain't going down on my watch. Watching all the videos of this clusterfuck has me questioning just what the hell has happened to the USSS. We may not have been good after "Wheels Up" , but everyone was always at the top of their game while the VIP was on site. I'd say more, but I don't like visitors. Eod1sg Ret

    ReplyDelete
  12. And the other 80% believe that the SS would likely be the folks responsible for the assassination.

    ReplyDelete
  13. WestcoastDeplorableJuly 19, 2024 at 3:11 PM

    Story I heard was Jill and Kamala both had appearances in PA on Sat so the SS was understaffed, so they were relying on local LEO. Thing that gets me is, they were aware of the suspicious behavior of Crook but didn't detain him. And the chick in charge is going out of her way to answer any questions. Like I said before, I smell a rat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And of course they are using the oft-used aurgument about discloing methods and tactics or what ever they say, but the thing is, most of was done at that rally, should not be repeated.

      Delete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.