Last month, a progressive Chicago alderman decided to stop disseminating alerts about crime in her ward because “over-reporting of crime leads to an inaccurate public perception about violent crime rates and negatively impacts our most marginalized and underserved neighbors,” and sharing this information supposedly runs contrary to values of “empowerment, anti-racism and community.”
In another incident of undermining factual reporting as ideologically or politically harmful, an article in The Guardian, a left-leaning British daily, claims that “spot” news reporting by social media users in the D.C. metro area feeds a narrative of failed progressive policies.
The morals of the fables passed down through the centuries are being ignored. On purpose. Willfully. Intentionally.
ReplyDeleteThey are too correct, disallowing of alternate trufs. Der four rayciss
we must cherish and protect our justice impacted individuals
ReplyDeleteWe need more "just impacts", per individual, in certain demographics.
DeleteOne way to keep the public from knowing what a shit job you are doing. You were elected to fix problems not ignore them.
ReplyDeleteThe guardian is a sht paper and deserves nothing more than to live the bottom of a bird cage so 😎🖕assholes
ReplyDeleteJD
Why you hatin' on Tweety Bird?
DeleteVigilantism will make a big comeback.
ReplyDeleteChutes Magoo
Describing the Guardian as 'left-leaning' is as mild as describing AOC as 'slightly disconnected from reality'.
ReplyDeleteThis one made be check an old Chicongo website. Heyjackass.com
ReplyDeleteThey got the numbers and pie charts, and the pie charts and graphs are funny as fuck