Mine has 14HP but blocks up and stalls in wet grass. It's fast on good lawn but ain't a lethal weapon in the rough, except that time I was holding the chute open with my foot in a gumboot and a stone got spat out. It hurt.
For the first 64 years of my life, no need for a riding mower. Buy 25 acres on a Tennessee hilltop with one acre cleared around the house, it COMES with a Husqvarna, 48 inch, riding mower. Also have a DR brush mower, regular mower, weed eater, Pulaski, mattix. Different tools for different zones of hazards and difficulties. Wear oots, we have copperheads and mountain rattlers. Compared to So. Cal. rattlers, their Tennessee cousins are chill.
Offs, if the CGI was as bad in ‘83, imagine trying to fake a moon landing in 1969. I’m with Buzz on this, if you think the moon landings were fake you should be punched in the face.
Kind of a round about counter argument, citing tech from a random year like 1983, especially when "2001: A Space Odyssey" was released in 1968 with much better special effects, most of which weren't CGI. And no, I don't think the moon landings were fake, I just prefer better arguments when making a point.
If NASA faked the moon landings with 1969 video technology why didn't the soviets fake their own? Its better to come in second than to not finish at all.
The whole point of the space race was winning it. Once Appollo 11 completed, the Soviets knew they had lost the race, and were too far behind in heavy booster development to make a credible show, or pick another goal to lengthen the race. The Soviet acceptance of Appollo as genuine is one of the strongest pieces of evidence that it wasn't faked, not that anyone in this thread is suggesting it was faked.
If the first place winner did something that killed all the second place contestants with radiation like a sausage link in a microwave for 15 minutes, would you risk admitting you think it's impossible with the current technology you know have?
My wife showed it to me and laughed, which is unusual as she doesn't like dirty humor. Then she said the chocolate thing and I'm, uh, ok? I would've went with pubic hair, but that's just my dirty mind.
3. The technology to go to the moon existed in 1969. The technology to fake it wasn't invented until the 2000s. People who think the moon landings were faked are the 3rd dumbest people on the planet, right behind Queers for Palestine and flat earthers.
Not that it was faked, but convincing fakes could have been made with technology available at the time. As mentioned above, 2001: A Space Odyssey from 1968 and the original Star Wars from 1977, all predate and have much better special effects than the meme displays from 1983. Fake landings using that tech would have compared favorably to the public against the actual grainy B&W video from Apollo 11. Stanley Kubrick reportedly was asked if he faked the moon landings, to which he said no, but also said that he could have. The most convincing evidence Apollo wasn't faked isn't video.
On #3, when was the last time the government told us the truth about anything? Doesn't mean they faked it, but real or fake, we can be sure they were lying. It's what they do.
All good ones but my favorite is # 13, pumpkin spice tuna, mmm 😋
ReplyDeleteJD
I think there was pumpkin spice Spam one year. I keep looking for it.
Delete#6 Just say "treat" & watch your dog inflate.
ReplyDeleteStill laughing at #19, but I never had a ride mower.
ReplyDeleteMine has 14HP but blocks up and stalls in wet grass. It's fast on good lawn but ain't a lethal weapon in the rough, except that time I was holding the chute open with my foot in a gumboot and a stone got spat out. It hurt.
DeleteFor the first 64 years of my life, no need for a riding mower. Buy 25 acres on a Tennessee hilltop with one acre cleared around the house, it COMES with a Husqvarna, 48 inch, riding mower. Also have a DR brush mower, regular mower, weed eater, Pulaski, mattix. Different tools for different zones of hazards and difficulties. Wear oots, we have copperheads and mountain rattlers. Compared to So. Cal. rattlers, their Tennessee cousins are chill.
Delete#3 The Apollo 11 moonlanding was in 1969, what's the relevance of CGI in 1983?
ReplyDeleteOffs, if the CGI was as bad in ‘83, imagine trying to fake a moon landing in 1969. I’m with Buzz on this, if you think the moon landings were fake you should be punched in the face.
DeleteOne of the conspiracy theories is that Stanley Kubrick filmed it on a sound stage. He had just done 2001 A Space Odyssey in 1965/66.
DeleteKind of a round about counter argument, citing tech from a random year like 1983, especially when "2001: A Space Odyssey" was released in 1968 with much better special effects, most of which weren't CGI. And no, I don't think the moon landings were fake, I just prefer better arguments when making a point.
DeleteIf NASA faked the moon landings with 1969 video technology why didn't the soviets fake their own? Its better to come in second than to not finish at all.
DeleteThe whole point of the space race was winning it. Once Appollo 11 completed, the Soviets knew they had lost the race, and were too far behind in heavy booster development to make a credible show, or pick another goal to lengthen the race. The Soviet acceptance of Appollo as genuine is one of the strongest pieces of evidence that it wasn't faked, not that anyone in this thread is suggesting it was faked.
DeleteIf the first place winner did something that killed all the second place contestants with radiation like a sausage link in a microwave for 15 minutes, would you risk admitting you think it's impossible with the current technology you know have?
Delete#17 is belong to meee. lol. Thanks for the laughs.
ReplyDeleteNot sure about #14.
ReplyDeleteDo you need a blow by blow description?
DeleteClue me on 18.
ReplyDeleteDentists can see bruising on the roof of her mouth from oral sex
DeleteHer breath smells of semen or her epiglottis is bruised.
DeletePubes stuck between her teeth?
DeleteMichael in Nelson
Boyfriends give chocolate and candy to their girlfriends on Valentines Day.
DeleteJFM
The dentist can see the bruising on the tonsils....
DeleteMy wife showed it to me and laughed, which is unusual as she doesn't like dirty humor. Then she said the chocolate thing and I'm, uh, ok? I would've went with pubic hair, but that's just my dirty mind.
Delete3. The technology to go to the moon existed in 1969. The technology to fake it wasn't invented until the 2000s.
ReplyDeletePeople who think the moon landings were faked are the 3rd dumbest people on the planet, right behind Queers for Palestine and flat earthers.
Flat Earthers
DeleteNot that it was faked, but convincing fakes could have been made with technology available at the time. As mentioned above, 2001: A Space Odyssey from 1968 and the original Star Wars from 1977, all predate and have much better special effects than the meme displays from 1983. Fake landings using that tech would have compared favorably to the public against the actual grainy B&W video from Apollo 11. Stanley Kubrick reportedly was asked if he faked the moon landings, to which he said no, but also said that he could have. The most convincing evidence Apollo wasn't faked isn't video.
DeleteWhich ignores the fact that if we had to go again today, we'd have to fake it. Ain't no one at Nasa could DEI their way to the moon now.
DeleteAll of these are excellent. Loved em.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much!
ReplyDeleteOn #3, when was the last time the government told us the truth about anything? Doesn't mean they faked it, but real or fake, we can be sure they were lying. It's what they do.
ReplyDelete