A federal appears court made the ruling on Thursday, October 24, allowing a ban on firearms from being carried in locations like schools, hospitals, and on public transportation to continue being enforced.
*****
What the article fails to mention is that in order to push back against recent Supreme Court decisions, the governor declared damn near everywhere a 'sensitive' area.
NY public transportation is where people need to be able to defend themselves the most.
ReplyDeleteI predict that most violent crimes will occur in 'sensitive areas' where the criminals know their victims are not armed.
California and Hawaii have both tried this crap too. It's the Prog State's revenge for SCOTUS' Bruen decision.
ReplyDeleteThe good news about this ruling is that now any off-duty police officer riding the trains must, by law, be unarmed. Good luck you bastards.
ReplyDeleteRead the fine print. If it's like almost all new California gun laws, "Current and retired law enforcement officers are exempt from this law".
DeleteI'd be willing to bet New York cuts and pastes their gun laws after California, which the totalitarians in Sacramento believe is "leading the nation".
The progressives are neurotic, sick, obsessed motherfuckers. No matter what the courts mandate they will spend every hour of every day figuring of ways how to circumvent the decisions. This is a quality that gives them a big edge over "live and let live" conservatives.
ReplyDeleteAnd the beauty of it is that these sick, neurotic, obsessed em-effers can use taxpayer money to pass and defend laws that they know are unconstitutional.
DeleteWhat was Governor Moonbeam's response when informed that a bill he just signed into law was unconstitutional?
"See you in court."
Governor moonbeam should be put in gen pop for a time for contempt of court. That might actually get a result.
DeleteWhether intentional or not, the line "A federal appears court made the ruling" is accurate. It only appears to be a court.
ReplyDeleteNice that the criminal politicians protect the low level criminals by creating "Gun-free" zones, especially in the places that deserve protection by firearms.
ReplyDeleteUn-constitutional crap.
So it'll get challenged, if it hasn't been already, and get set aside. This happens all the time in NY. A court makes a decision that's clearly wrong, and a few weeks or months later it gets reversed. The problem is that the first judge suffers no harm from a clearly bad call, so he does it again.
ReplyDeleteI've been reading "Gun Control in the Third Reich" by Stephan Halbrook. The Gun Control Act of 1968 (and most subsequent laws) were a copy of German laws. The similarities are uncanny.
ReplyDeleteWhen the Germans passed their laws they said, let's be sure the gun registry lists don't fall into the wrong hands, because they could be used for confiscation efforts. Guess what happened as soon as Adolf came to power.
I feel for the right thinking people caught behind enemy lines but those that vote for these shot heals get what they deserve... Don't cry about it afterwards
ReplyDeleteJD