Hunters take note: State attorneys are arguing your rifles are not “constitutionally” protected in Connecticut.
What does that mean? According to attorney Joshua Perry, who works for the Connecticut Attorney General’s office, this means hunting rifles are legal but not protected by the Constitution. He argues that the Constitution only guarantees citizens the right to guns commonly used in self-defense and that semi-automatic rifles used in hunting do not fall into that category.
He's full of crap. Any & every firearm I have is for self defense. Semi auto, pump or single shot.
ReplyDeleteDeliberate misstatement of the SC judgement.
ReplyDelete"By any means necessary". Remember the neurotic, obsessed Progs have a goal and are playing the long game. It may be laughable now but it's like building a wall by placing down one brick a month. 3 generations and 60 years later the people only know the wall exists. They don't question how it was constructed.
ReplyDeleteWillful misinterpretation.
ReplyDeleteIt's bait intended to lure you into a false argument. Instead of correctly reply that the 2nd Amendment was not written for hunting 4-legged critters, the gun lobby will cave on something like hi-cap magazines thinking it will pacify the lunatics that want to take everyone's guns away.
ReplyDeleteTeehee giggle SNORT BWAHAHAHA ROFLMAO
ReplyDeleteLaughs in FAFO
Another states attorney looking for a legal bitchslap?
ReplyDeleteThese State's attorney's are not idiots. They are liars. The 2nd amendment is a blanket prohibition on government interference in the RKBA. They know it and betray their oaths. Even if there were no 2A there is no authority anywhere in the Constitution for federal regulation of arms. Each of them are treasonous pukes.
ReplyDeleteSon of the Father of Lies. The 2nd amendment makes no such stipulation regarding guns, however it has quite a bit to say regarding potential tyrants.
ReplyDeleteCC
So... when it comes to defending my home, I have to say, "Well, I WOULD stop you from breaking in but I only have a hunting rifle, and they aren't used for self-defense."
ReplyDeleteThe politicians have an infinite supply of tax payer money to make new laws against guns that are the same as the laws the supreme court has shot down. And then defend them to the supreme court again.
ReplyDelete