Since the implementation of Extreme-Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), or “red flag” laws, numerous studies and high-profile incidents have cast doubt on their effectiveness and raised concerns about potential abuses and deadly outcomes. While ERPOs are intended to prevent gun violence by temporarily removing firearms from individuals deemed a threat to themselves or others, evidence from recent studies and case examples demonstrates significant flaws in both effectiveness and due process.
MORE
Oh great. Now the asshats will double-down.
ReplyDeleteSurprise surprise surprise
ReplyDeleteNot only illegal and useless but unconstitutional...
ReplyDeleteJD
unconstitutional. That doesn't matter anymore
DeleteI am glad that my ex has been dead for the past 28 years: she would have been playing this game 7*24*365*28 plus a few leap days.
ReplyDeleteHow did you kill her?
DeleteSolftly, with his love...
DeleteThe real purpose behind ERPO's is to take away legally owned guns. The people behind these abuses don't give a red rats ass about anyone's safety, except their own.
ReplyDelete