Since the implementation of Extreme-Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs), or “red flag” laws, numerous studies and high-profile incidents have cast doubt on their effectiveness and raised concerns about potential abuses and deadly outcomes. While ERPOs are intended to prevent gun violence by temporarily removing firearms from individuals deemed a threat to themselves or others, evidence from recent studies and case examples demonstrates significant flaws in both effectiveness and due process.
MORE
Oh great. Now the asshats will double-down.
ReplyDeleteSurprise surprise surprise
ReplyDeleteNot only illegal and useless but unconstitutional...
ReplyDeleteJD
unconstitutional. That doesn't matter anymore
DeleteI am glad that my ex has been dead for the past 28 years: she would have been playing this game 7*24*365*28 plus a few leap days.
ReplyDeleteHow did you kill her?
DeleteSolftly, with his love...
DeleteI am glad my ex lives three states away from me and doesn't know where I live for the same reasons.
DeleteMy brother's ex was able to get an ERPO on him though he lived >800 miles away. Eighteen hours to drive, no airport within fifty miles of his location. Plus, he worked 6 days per week and she knew that. (No time to make the drive out or round trip.)
DeleteShe is a master at the game, can sweet talk even the most cold hearted lawyer or hanging judge.
The real purpose behind ERPO's is to take away legally owned guns. The people behind these abuses don't give a red rats ass about anyone's safety, except their own.
ReplyDeleteI came here to say that.
DeleteHaving been the victim of one and still waiting for a hearing 16 months later, I will just say there wont be a next time.
ReplyDelete