Pages


Tuesday, February 11, 2025

'Lies and conspiracies about my family and me are nothing new'

Chelsea Clinton claims that 'misinformation' has been weaponized against her after claims she was gifted $84million from the under fire United States Agency for International Development (USAID). 
MORE

22 comments:

  1. Chelsea is claiming the $84 million gift is misinformation. That might be substantiated, but there is no way she can claim the fact she's “uglier than a herpes infected, elderly gorilla’s” ass misinformation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They say something outlandish,so when it's only 8.4 million it doesn't sound as bad.Government grifter's with zero skills other than bullshit!

      Delete
    2. SHHHH!
      Do you wanna get Arkancided?!!
      -lg

      Delete
    3. Shame, shame on you. You should treat Webb Hubble's kid with more dignity and respect!

      https://sl.bing.net/dmZ0vIw4wHk

      Delete
  2. Then I am sure that she will happily cooperate with a complete and thorough audit comparable to what us plebes would have to go through.

    ReplyDelete
  3. They used Snopes to fact check-LOL.............tells you pretty much all you need to know right there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The couple living in a double wide out in California.

      Delete
  4. the daily mail failed to report the whole story, instead it pushed propaganda and disinformation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. We are talking the Daily Mail here, remember?

      Delete
    2. yup, just wanted to say it out loud

      Delete
  5. Notice she didn’t deny the claim.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I believe the horse faced child of the most disgusting person wallowing the earth about as much as I believe I can throw an elephant up hill with 1 hand...
    Fuck off bitch and take that scab of a mother with you..
    JD

    ReplyDelete
  7. Meanwhile, SecDef Pete Hegseth officially restores FORT BRAGG to agree with what everyone of the planet has been calling it for the past 4 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not quite. He didn't restore the original name, he changed it to Fort Bragg to honor a WWII soldier.

      https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4062245/secretary-of-defense-pete-hegseth-renames-fort-liberty-to-fort-bragg/

      Delete
    2. Instead of half-assedly renaming it to some WW2 soldier, he should have unashamedly renamed it back to the Confederate general and dared anybody to do something about it.

      And by the way, I'm not up on what the WW2 soldier did, but it probably involved him getting killed in a gruesome way, and I'm not trying to belittle that.

      Delete
    3. In other words. If Pete had balls he would have restored the fort's name to remember the Civil war confederate Bragg and not a WWII soldier that nobody remembers

      Delete
    4. I'm all for naming forts after heroic privates and not generals who don't carry a weapon into battle. (To clarify for those who will be upset I'm talking about the trannies, milleys and the like .)

      Delete
  8. Did she wag her finger while she was saying this?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Just make it all public...then charge her.

    ReplyDelete
  10. She has her mothers legs.

    Fitty

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I nearly vomited up my dinner after seeing that pic. ugh

      Delete
  11. Snopes is hardly clearing Hillary jr. It states "she did not receive the money DIRECTLY". Well, I never get money DIRECTLY from clients, it gets laundered through my employer first. That hardly means that they aren't paying me.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls. Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.
Posted comments are the opinions of the commenters, not the site administrator.