Pages


Monday, March 03, 2025

California Gun Owners Beware: ‘Duty to Retreat’ Required in New Bill

The California gun prohibition lobby is hailing a new Assembly bill that includes a duty to retreat “When the person was outside of their residence and knew that using force likely to cause death or great bodily injury could have been avoided with complete safety by retreating,” but the measure is drawing a barrage of criticism from Republicans.
Posted by

10 comments:

  1. DanoMarch 3, 2025 at 3:56 PM

    Christ, Kenny....you gotta be so glad you left that fuckin state.

    ReplyDelete
  2. jwjMarch 3, 2025 at 4:09 PM

    here in Florida, we have STAND YOUR GROUND on the books. On your feet or on your knees in Commifornia.

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousMarch 3, 2025 at 4:13 PM

    This state continues to go too far and I keep wondering what it's going to take to finally send people over the edge. I thought it might be electric rates, then free health care for illegals, then the Palisades fire, newscums stealing covid funds, then more rate hikes. But no, it's more la,la,la,la. Everything is fine.

    ReplyDelete
  4. AnonymousMarch 3, 2025 at 4:28 PM

    Pleae tell me that law applies to the police as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ElmoMarch 3, 2025 at 5:17 PM

      You silly boy. Don't you know current and retired California law enforcement officers have been exempted from every gun law passed in the state since the beginning of time?

      Delete
  5. ElmoMarch 3, 2025 at 5:12 PM

    Here's a quote from the knucklehead who introduced this bill-

    "The goal is to prevent wannabe vigilantes like Kyle Rittenhouse from provoking violence & claiming self-defense after the fact. We will amend the bill to make this crystal clear.”

    He obviously knows nothing of the facts in the Kyle Rittenhouse case. Or he's an idiot. Or he's a liar. Or he's just a typical craven California Democrat ideologue.

    ReplyDelete
  6. cjMarch 3, 2025 at 5:48 PM

    "... and knew that using force likely to cause death or great bodily injury could have been avoided with complete safety by retreating". So now you're required to have ESP and know that something can be avoided? There are some mighty thin sets of circumstances that would satisfy that.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Univ of Saigon 68March 3, 2025 at 5:53 PM

    ". . . the measure is drawing a barrage of criticism from Republicans."

    All seven of them?

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls. Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.
Posted comments are the opinions of the commenters, not the site administrator.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)