That Space Force colonel in command in Greenland – well, formerly in command in Greenland – who ran her fool mouth to undermine her commander-in-chief demonstrates an all-too-common problem with today’s senior military officers. We keep seeing these passive-aggressive, and not so passively aggressive, officers acting out and throwing childish tantrums of resistance to the President that the people of the United States elected. It’s inconceivable to those of us from the military who won the Cold War; we stayed the hell out of politics. Somehow, they must have missed that civilian control block of instruction; non-partisanship is a vital principle of our officer corps. To be political on duty is a violation of our oaths. It’s a violation of our ethos as officers. And it’s got to be brutally crushed – even Barack Obama understood that when he properly canned General Stanley McChrystal for having a staff that thought it was okay to diss the President to reporters (incredibly, after this massive leadership failure, McChrystal has gone on to sell his leadership insights to eager civilian suckers, but that’s another story).
-Alemaster
Get rid of the treasonous Obama-Biden holdovers. We have two family members whose careers are in jeopardy because they're conservative. In both cases their superior officers are Biden sycophants. Officers who respect Biden cannot be trusted. Get rid of them.
ReplyDeleteOdumbass wanted to fundamentally change America, his 8 years as officially president then the 4 while they pretended Xiden was has poisoned our country... Past time to clean house of all the trash he brought in..
ReplyDeleteJD
It is not enough to relieve this twat of duty. She MUST be prosecuted under UCMJ. Lets start with article 88, 130, and 134. Jail this bitch.
ReplyDeleteSomebody please help me with this. We are supposed to focus on the mission, but when the mission violates the constitution, what are we to do? I didn’t think our oath was to an individual, but to the constitution I would love to hear intelligent comments.
ReplyDeleteViolates the Constitution? By what metric? By who's interpretation? You? You have, pardon my observation, no standing. If you feel an order has violated the Constitution, you would explain your reasons to your immediate boss, and then resign your commission.
DeleteOn the other hand, honourable officers true to their oath to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign and DOMESTIC are presented with the choice of fighting the deep state and puppets like OhBummer and Buydem, or resigning their commissions and continuing their oath like men such as Washington and Lee. The dishonest ones will be Kadavergehorsam, like the bureaucrats, and the result will be death camp genocides and foolish foreign adventures and ruin foreign and domestic.
ReplyDeleteReply for Anon at 12:37pm... true, all members of the military have a specific duty and obligation to refuse an unlawful order, and yes, our oath is to the Constitution... but I'm not understanding what situation or mission it is that you are positing that is in violation of that Constitution . Please do give a specific example of such and I'd be happy to discuss .
ReplyDeleteRetRsvMike
They should court martial and dishonorably discharge that scrunt so she can't retire and collect a pension.
ReplyDeleteSuch people also claim they are being true to their oath, not to a president.
ReplyDeleteSadly, this is a lot more common that people think. I have an uncle that was a bird Col in the airforce, he's retired now. He also held a couple of diplomatic positions, has a PolySci degree, and yep, a terminal case of TDS. Bottom line, A LOT of these people just think they are smarter than everyone else and are to elitist to follow the rules sometimes.
ReplyDelete