As an anti-vaxer my answer is, after it's proven after long serious testing it's shown to be effective and doesn't cause more issues than it solves them I'll consider it.. Until that point it's still junk science JD
Pstt. I got some genuine anti cancer vaccine. Fauci approved. European government surplus goods. Good price. Wanna buy? For you good price for cash. Terms and conditions apply. You ain't got cancer? We can arrange.
I'm in total agreement with you, if it's so good why are they trying to push it on us so hard ? Let's see the work for ourselves.. oh I see I forgot to add independently tested JD
I'm not an 'anti-vaxer', but do have serious doubts about the efficacy of the current approach to vaccinations. With that said, allow me to address your questions.
If it's a vaccine that has been proven by proper testing and time that it works, based on current evidence, it'll be the exception to the rule. And worth consideration based on the rest of my medical condition, health, and susceptibilities.
If it's mandated, that's an immediate loss of 100 points and probably a deal killer.
As for the stick comment, sometimes I want to hit stupid people over the head with a stick. I usually don't and trust me, you don't want to be the exception because I probably won't stop for awhile.
Are all good now? Don't know about you, but I'm feeling all warm and fuzzy.
I once owned stock in a start-up company with a drug still in the testing stage, so I was aware of the process (and time) of bringing a drug to market. The shot bypassed normal regulations.
The hard sell despite this should've made anyone cautious.
The problem is that the left has destroyed language. 15 years ago, vaccine was something that contained a dead or weakened version of the virus you're trying to immunize against. mRNA would not be considered a vaccine. 15 years ago, you had to have a double blind test conducted over 10 to 15 years. These days, computer models seem sufficient.
I was not anti vax. My kids were all fully vaccinated. I did not get the clot shot. I have enough of a science background to see through the BS that was being spewed. I'm with the others who say, "wait and see the results." If it was an mRNA vaccine, absolutely not.
Heh, notice all these wonder drugs pharma companies tell you to take come with (possible) side effects that are worse than the affliction you're experiencing? Oh, you're having side effects? We have a medication for that too! What a coincidence... - WDS
I saw a post by RFK on the efficacy of pretty much all vaccines developed since the 1940s; turns out that every malady they were designed to prevent had already dissipated to low levels by the time they were introduced. Seems that better nutrition and hygiene had more to do with the reduction than anything else. Hmmm...
#20. FAKE! The real housewives of the Palistidiots would be standing on a pile of rubble. The Palistidiots always kill the goat after sex because bestiality is punishable by death.
The brown one is kinda cute- on the list for wife#4- Wisdom from Ayatollah Khomeini: “A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.” From Khomeini’s book, Tahrir al-Vasyleh, fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
Man, you want obscure. I started way before Stack Overflow was around. In my first job, I wrote a test harness that passed 160MB of synthetic data generated using a modified westlake pseudorandom variant generator. About 20MB into the data set, I crashed 3 Univac 1100/84 mainframes and 3 Amdahl file processors. Roughly 200 million dollars worth of hardware in 1980 dollars. All of the jobs running on those machines at the time were lost. I did that three times in a row, on the same day, before I figured out it was me. I got dragged over the coals for it but it allowed us to find an extremely odd bug in the microcode that drove the network adaptors (an early version of collision avoidance adaptors that preceded the development of ethernet). I have stories.
All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls. Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic. Posted comments are the opinions of the commenters, not the site administrator.
So, if it is a vaccine that cures cancer, what will the anti-vaxers stance on the cure be?
ReplyDeleteSometimes I want to poke people with sticks.
Daryl, you sound like a Leftist.
Delete'Same as always; let it run a while and see who does or doesn't die... 'Worked GREAT for me with the clot shot!
DeleteTo anon 2:25. Lefties avoid the hard questions by pointing fingers and making false accusations. So, what would you do, get the shot or get cancer?
DeleteAs an anti-vaxer my answer is, after it's proven after long serious testing it's shown to be effective and doesn't cause more issues than it solves them I'll consider it.. Until that point it's still junk science
DeleteJD
Pstt. I got some genuine anti cancer vaccine. Fauci approved. European government surplus goods. Good price. Wanna buy? For you good price for cash. Terms and conditions apply. You ain't got cancer? We can arrange.
DeleteJD, I'm with you. I also want to add that the harder something is shoved down my throat, the harder I'm going to fight it.
DeleteI'm in total agreement with you, if it's so good why are they trying to push it on us so hard ? Let's see the work for ourselves.. oh I see I forgot to add independently tested
DeleteJD
Dearest Daryl,
DeleteThe last 'vaccine' not only did not prevent kung flu, but it is killing people 'suddenly'.
So I think I'll continue to be anti vac.
Also, congratulations on your early release from the home.
Daryl, you still sound like a Leftist by backing us all into a corner with an either/or question.
Delete"Would you drink a while bucket of poison or just half? JUSTIFY YOUR ANSWER COWARD!"
Deletelol
I'm not an 'anti-vaxer', but do have serious doubts about the efficacy of the current approach to vaccinations. With that said, allow me to address your questions.
DeleteIf it's a vaccine that has been proven by proper testing and time that it works, based on current evidence, it'll be the exception to the rule. And worth consideration based on the rest of my medical condition, health, and susceptibilities.
If it's mandated, that's an immediate loss of 100 points and probably a deal killer.
As for the stick comment, sometimes I want to hit stupid people over the head with a stick. I usually don't and trust me, you don't want to be the exception because I probably won't stop for awhile.
Are all good now? Don't know about you, but I'm feeling all warm and fuzzy.
Had cancer. Still wouldn't take the shot.
DeleteI once owned stock in a start-up company with a drug still in the testing stage, so I was aware of the process (and time) of bringing a drug to market. The shot bypassed normal regulations.
DeleteThe hard sell despite this should've made anyone cautious.
The problem is that the left has destroyed language. 15 years ago, vaccine was something that contained a dead or weakened version of the virus you're trying to immunize against. mRNA would not be considered a vaccine. 15 years ago, you had to have a double blind test conducted over 10 to 15 years. These days, computer models seem sufficient.
DeleteI was not anti vax. My kids were all fully vaccinated. I did not get the clot shot. I have enough of a science background to see through the BS that was being spewed. I'm with the others who say, "wait and see the results." If it was an mRNA vaccine, absolutely not.
Heh, notice all these wonder drugs pharma companies tell you to take come with (possible) side effects that are worse than the affliction you're experiencing?
DeleteOh, you're having side effects? We have a medication for that too! What a coincidence...
- WDS
I'd have to wait and see on the vaccine , but I would buy the stock today.
DeleteDaryl - LOL, you have been successful in your mission of stirring the pot.
DeleteJudy, I think he enjoyed it.
DeleteI saw a post by RFK on the efficacy of pretty much all vaccines developed since the 1940s; turns out that every malady they were designed to prevent had already dissipated to low levels by the time they were introduced. Seems that better nutrition and hygiene had more to do with the reduction than anything else. Hmmm...
Delete#20. FAKE! The real housewives of the Palistidiots would be standing on a pile of rubble.
ReplyDeleteThe Palistidiots always kill the goat after sex because bestiality is punishable by death.
And that village may not eat the goat but another village may.
DeleteThe brown one is kinda cute- on the list for wife#4-
DeleteWisdom from Ayatollah Khomeini: “A man can have sex with animals such as sheep, cows, camels and so on. However he should kill the animal after he has his orgasm. He should not sell the meat to the people in his own village, however selling the meat to the next door village should be fine.” From Khomeini’s book, Tahrir al-Vasyleh, fourth volume, Darol Elm, Gom, Iran, 1990
I have seen #8 before.....and I still laugh every single time I see it.
ReplyDelete#8 ... Is a female Shrek a Shriek or a Shrike?
ReplyDeleteShierkett
DeleteJD
I thought the female Shreck was Fiona???
DeleteShe sounds like she has a few ex's and is planning more for the future.
Delete#2 ... Re programmers: True dat. Stack Overflow was my constant companion through decades of software engineering.
ReplyDeleteMan, that's obscure.
DeleteMan, you want obscure. I started way before Stack Overflow was around. In my first job, I wrote a test harness that passed 160MB of synthetic data generated using a modified westlake pseudorandom variant generator. About 20MB into the data set, I crashed 3 Univac 1100/84 mainframes and 3 Amdahl file processors. Roughly 200 million dollars worth of hardware in 1980 dollars. All of the jobs running on those machines at the time were lost. I did that three times in a row, on the same day, before I figured out it was me. I got dragged over the coals for it but it allowed us to find an extremely odd bug in the microcode that drove the network adaptors (an early version of collision avoidance adaptors that preceded the development of ethernet). I have stories.
Delete#15 ?????
ReplyDeleteThink about it and it'll come to you
DeleteJD