"providing the world with free knowledge". That word, I do not think you know what it means. He is providing the world with 35,000 articles expressing his opinion, which may or may not be in agreement with the consensus of those learned in the specific topic. A highly productive scientist writes perhaps a hundred or two papers in a professional lifetime, usually reflecting a decades long focus on a narrow topic. It's not credible that he knows enough to be able to write 35,000 articles (the implication is that they covered a wide range of topics). Britannica used teams of researchers and editors. This is one person.
THIS is the reason Wikipedia is not a reliable or credible source of information. A single individual making millions of edits? Tens of thousands of original content?
#1 Obsessive much dude? #2 What every one else said about bland generic info printed in yet ANOTHER location. I call it PARROTing. AWK, Polly want a cracker?? #3 On the other hand, I can EASILY believe, zillion "edits" where if you counted every typo and shit spelling that the ultrashitty voice to text made, and the person didn't see or care enough to correct OR didn't even know it was spelled wrong? NOW, if only the "print media" news would hire someone diligent to proof their writing! Fucking idiots with shit grammar, syntax, and everything else... spiffy
Wikipedia content that has any political or social "wokeness" aspect to it is totally undependable. Other than that, it should be treated as a unverified secondary source at best.
Nonsense. That man is probably fucking hundreds of thousands of people 24/7. Fucking, fucking over, same difference.
Maybe he's an awesome dude, I dunno. But his Wikipedia entry (y'all see what I did there) is concerning:
"He fights systemic bias on Wikipedia to promote the inclusion of women"
"Pruitt was born around 1984 in San Antonio, Texas, the only child of Alla Pruitt, a Russian Jewish immigrant, and Donald Pruitt of Richmond, Virginia [...] He attended the College of William & Mary and graduated in 2006 with a degree in art history."
Born around 1984? AROUND? What kind of weird-ass description is that? I can maybe understand not wanting to give out your exact birth date (anti-fraud purposes), but the freaking year? Any road, he looks older than 36 to me. (And health-wise is almost certainly functionally older and likely has metabolic syndrome.)
And it's all lies.....
ReplyDeleteWikipedia & Snopes ... liberal shit-holes of wrong information that is gospel to the left.
ReplyDeleteThere are better places to get information.
Ya think? The stalls in a public restroom have better information written on them
DeleteAnd we trust him because why?
ReplyDeleteBecause he's a (((fellow white man))), of course...
DeleteSo, he's responsible for Wikipedia's liberal bias. Asshole.
ReplyDeleteKind of depends on how correct all his edits and articles are objectively, doesn't it?
ReplyDeleteThe free encyclopedia is worth exactly what you pay for it.
"providing the world with free knowledge". That word, I do not think you know what it means. He is providing the world with 35,000 articles expressing his opinion, which may or may not be in agreement with the consensus of those learned in the specific topic. A highly productive scientist writes perhaps a hundred or two papers in a professional lifetime, usually reflecting a decades long focus on a narrow topic. It's not credible that he knows enough to be able to write 35,000 articles (the implication is that they covered a wide range of topics). Britannica used teams of researchers and editors. This is one person.
ReplyDeleteTHIS is the reason Wikipedia is not a reliable or credible source of information. A single individual making millions of edits? Tens of thousands of original content?
Interesting word there - "knowledge". Does not apply in his case. We used to laugh people out of engineering meetings for quoting wikistupid.
ReplyDeleteLooks like a liberal backstop at range day
ReplyDeleteGood for beginners at any range. He would be hard to miss.
DeleteHeh
Delete#1 Obsessive much dude?
ReplyDelete#2 What every one else said about bland generic info printed in yet ANOTHER location. I call it PARROTing. AWK, Polly want a cracker??
#3 On the other hand, I can EASILY believe, zillion "edits" where if you counted every typo and shit spelling that the ultrashitty voice to text made, and the person didn't see or care enough to correct OR didn't even know it was spelled wrong?
NOW, if only the "print media" news would hire someone diligent to proof their writing! Fucking idiots with shit grammar, syntax, and everything else...
spiffy
Wikipedia content that has any political or social "wokeness" aspect to it is totally undependable. Other than that, it should be treated as a unverified secondary source at best.
ReplyDelete"he has ZERO sex life"
ReplyDeleteNonsense. That man is probably fucking hundreds of thousands of people 24/7.
Fucking, fucking over, same difference.
Maybe he's an awesome dude, I dunno. But his Wikipedia entry (y'all see what I did there) is concerning:
"He fights systemic bias on Wikipedia to promote the inclusion of women"
"Pruitt was born around 1984 in San Antonio, Texas, the only child of Alla Pruitt, a Russian Jewish immigrant, and Donald Pruitt of Richmond, Virginia [...] He attended the College of William & Mary and graduated in 2006 with a degree in art history."
Born around 1984? AROUND? What kind of weird-ass description is that? I can maybe understand not wanting to give out your exact birth date (anti-fraud purposes), but the freaking year? Any road, he looks older than 36 to me. (And health-wise is almost certainly functionally older and likely has metabolic syndrome.)
Free knowledge in his case is Free opinion.
ReplyDeleteWikipedia has become another leftist fake news disgrace. Their twist is sometimes suttle, but it's there if you look for it.
ReplyDeleteFuck that dog boy bitch, go kill yourself and the world becomes a better place.
ReplyDeleteJD
Is that Fat Barstard?
ReplyDeleteNever held a woman, never held a job, never held a gun. Armchair warrior at best
ReplyDeleteNever held a woman, never held a job, never held a gun. Armchair warrior at best
ReplyDelete