KENOSHA, Wis. — Prosecutors have charged a 17-year-old Illinois teen accused of shooting three people during a protest in Kenosha this summer with violating the curfew that night.
It's probably the only charge they have a chance of making stick. How many of the BLM terrorists were prosecuted with the same charge? If none, you have an unequal application of the law which is unconstitutional.
It's how these things go. Prosecution piles on the charges hoping for a plea deal. He was actually violating curfew, so it's a valid charge. Getting kind of picky, though, if you ask me. After all, all the demonstrators were also violating curfew as well. Let's see if they also charge Gaige Grosskreutz with a curfew violation.
since he was invited onto the property he was defending at the beginning of the riot, he was not in violation of the curfew. he was on private property.
Typical asshole fookin' dick head DA. Knows he doesn't have a case on the rest of the charges 'cause of all of the cell vids showing Rittenhouse acted in self defense. So where are the charges against the the asshole that Rittenhouse shot and only wounded? Rittenhouses lawyer should immediately be screaming that from the roof of the courthouse. Then just to further rub the DA's face in the dirt, if the DA does file against the wounded guy, Rittenhouses lawyer should defend that guy pro bono too.
It's probably the only charge they have a chance of making stick. How many of the BLM terrorists were prosecuted with the same charge? If none, you have an unequal application of the law which is unconstitutional.
ReplyDeleteAbsolutely.
DeleteIt's how these things go. Prosecution piles on the charges hoping for a plea deal. He was actually violating curfew, so it's a valid charge. Getting kind of picky, though, if you ask me. After all, all the demonstrators were also violating curfew as well. Let's see if they also charge Gaige Grosskreutz with a curfew violation.
ReplyDelete
DeleteHe'd have a very good argument for selective enforcement; however, specially since the police at the scene didn't even arrest him for it.
Not sure kangaroo courts really care about such things, however.
since he was invited onto the property he was defending at the beginning of the riot, he was not in violation of the curfew. he was on private property.
DeleteAlso tote the mattress tag off
ReplyDeleteTypical asshole fookin' dick head DA. Knows he doesn't have a case on the rest of the charges 'cause of all of the cell vids showing Rittenhouse acted in self defense. So where are the charges against the the asshole that Rittenhouse shot and only wounded? Rittenhouses lawyer should immediately be screaming that from the roof of the courthouse. Then just to further rub the DA's face in the dirt, if the DA does file against the wounded guy, Rittenhouses lawyer should defend that guy pro bono too.
ReplyDeletelawyers are going to fuck him any way they can.
ReplyDeleteNow that's a stretch.....the DA must be desperate.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if Kyle wishes he had saved some bullets for the prosecutor?
ReplyDeleteMaybe these liberal DA’s might disappear similar to Hoffa. There one day. Gone the next.
ReplyDeleteMadMarlin
Trump needs to pardon Kyle.
ReplyDelete