Pages


Friday, June 04, 2021

UNICEF Report Says Pornography Not Always Harmful to Children

WASHINGTON, D.C., May 14 (C-Fam) A UN agency is again immersed in controversy for a recent report suggesting there is no conclusive evidence that children exposed to pornography are harmed.
-WiscoDave

18 comments:

  1. Define 'harmed.' I've been exposed to it since I was 8 (because there was a 1976 Playboy magazine in the stack of Field & Stream in my grandparents house), and I fail to see how it could have hurt me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see where you are coming from but perhaps you should take a look at the “pornography” of today versus 1976 and reconsider.

      Delete
  2. I'm thinkin' like booze, porn should be reserved for the over 21's. Why waste it on confused kids who are already filled to the brim with Testosterone and Estrogen, but don't even know what gender they want to be.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If I would have waited until I was 18 (that's the "legal" age where I live) to start drinking, I would not have lived to see 19. Being a regular drinker from the age of 13 taught me much needed respect for and understanding of alcohol.

      Also not knowing what gender you want to be is mental illness, plain and simple, but for some reason we're not allowed to call it that anymore.

      Delete
  3. UNICEF, heading off the upcoming child porn scandal.
    Daryl

    ReplyDelete
  4. I found one of those dime novels when I was about ten....all it did was expose me to the reality of heterosexual goings on between men and women....I guess, according to the left, there was the harm...."It's a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world"....Nothing is new under the Sun....everything happening now has all been seen before....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Big difference between playboy in 1976 and xxx porn today

    ReplyDelete
  6. https://youtu.be/veIoioeOYbA

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is always a very divisive subject, one side says nothing to it while the other side wants to ban all of it and wants to hang anyone who disagrees with them. My opinion is I wouldn't want my 10 year old grandson looking at it but I think I'll be surprised if by 15 he isn't. It's like drinking or smoking in that it's an age appropriate subject.
    JD

    ReplyDelete
  8. Let's not forget that in the not too distant past, families lived in one room houses. That is still the case in many parts of the world. Porn? How about watching mom and dad make love?
    People today also are unaware of why some traditions exist. Consider the best man. In a traditional Jewish wedding ceremony, his job included witnessing the consumption. Partly to provide instructions, but primarily to report that yes, the bride was a virgin.
    How much gender confusion happened? Girls and boys knew their roll, they witnessed it first hand.
    In attempting to shield our kids from perversity, we have isolated them from normality.
    I wouldn't want my kids watching the crazy crap that is out there now, some of that is disturbing as hell.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Remember to that not so long ago marriage age was young, much younger than now. Young families literally meant young parents as well as children. Now I'm not saying that was a better way but as far as nature goes it was more natural than the whole artificial insemination that we had now.
      JD

      Delete
  9. I want to know how they tested the theory.

    ReplyDelete
  10. ... hits bong , "Well it cant be too good for the kids forced to make the movies huh ?"

    ReplyDelete
  11. My independently-funded and conducted professional analysis just concluded that .556 rounds aren’t harmful to UNICEF employees. Don’t question it, just take my word for it.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sounds like UNICEF ordered Pizza

    ReplyDelete
  13. The pedophiles of the UN try preparing the PR groundwork for their next big thing. No doubt with the backing of Epstein's previous clientele.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.