Pages


Wednesday, November 17, 2021

Rittenhouse prosecutors held back high-def drone footage of Kenosha shootings from defense and gave them low quality video

Prosecutors in the Kenosha shooter trial withheld evidence from the defense that was 'at the center of their case,' only sharing the high-definition drone video footage on which they have hung their prosecution after the trial had concluded, DailyMail.com can reveal. 

Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger played the enhanced drone footage to the jury during his closing statements and claimed that it showed Rittenhouse 'pointing his gun' at people – an assertion that opened the door to the state claiming Rittenhouse provoked the violence of the night of August 25, 2020. 

Now, in the motion obtained by DailyMail.com, Rittenhouse's defense insist that the state only shared it with the defense after evidence had closed on Saturday November 13.

*****

Between this and the other fuck-ups by the ADA, the judge really needs to declare a mistrial with prejudice so it can't be refiled.

13 comments:

  1. And Binger needs to be disbarred.
    Who does he think he is? A Department of Justice lawyer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For what? Disagreeing with your preconceived notion of how the trial should go?

      Because you "know" Rittenhoose is innocent?

      Yall are the most delusional group of people i have ever seen. Even antifa can verbalize a reason, misguided though it may be.

      But yall; yall are just talking in circles, lmao

      Delete
    2. Maybe because a lot of us, unlike you, have actually watched the trial and saw the evidence, fuckhead.

      Delete
    3. Sign your name big man instead of hiding behind your mothers skirt.
      Daryl

      Delete
    4. Verbalizing a reason (reasons)-

      1- Binger criticized the defendant for his choosing to remain silent, a Constitutional right, after his arrest, tacitly implying it was an admission of guilt.
      2- Binger pointed a weapon that he believed to be unloaded at people in the courtroom while his finger was on the trigger. Loaded or not, that was a stupid move. It was also completely unprofessional.
      3- Binger knowingly withheld evidence from the defense until all the evidence had been heard and the closing arguments were being made. This is a complete violation of the discovery process.

      You'll notice not a single one of these points has anything to do with Kyle Rittenhouse's guilt or innocence.
      Does that make you feel better, Anon?

      Delete
    5. Oh and you, whoever you are can eat a bag of dicks.

      Steve in KY

      Delete
  2. Disbarment and charges for the prosacution/persecution team.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Seems to me that the prosecution introduced evidence after they rested their case.

    That might work on "Perry Mason", but it shouldn't work in the real world.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You fukin betcha with these pukes. Hang 'em high.

    It's called collusion and conspiracy. Where have we heard these terms before?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Withholding exculpatory evidence from the defense. Mistrial with prejudice. Kyle walks.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The mistrial with prejudice is the outcome second most desired by the prostitution. Conviction being the most. Conviction = hahahaha
    Mistrial with prejudice = riots and hahahaha.

    Steve in KY

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mistrial and judge take the heat, he's not that stupid. Guilty nope. Hung jury yep.

    riots guaranteed no matter the decision. Its baked into the cake.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.