Pages


Monday, August 15, 2022

Missouri Sheriffs to FBI: "Stay in your own lane"

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has so far randomly audited 24 sheriff’s offices in Missouri in search of concealed carry weapon (CCW) details, but they all refused to comply, according to law enforcement authorities. 

“None released anything pertaining to CCWs themselves, but some did partially comply by answering procedural questions on issuing CCWs,” said Moniteau County’s Sheriff Tony Wheatley.

“They answered two of those standard questions but nothing, as far as I know, was given from any sheriff pertaining to any CCW files.”

13 comments:

  1. Good. After all the thuggery we've seen from the FBI, all other Law Enforcement should refuse to cooperate with them. The FBI is a Domestic Terrorist Organization and should be treated as such.

    ReplyDelete
  2. There is a separation of powers between federal and state. The FBI has no business asking for records unless they are investigating a specific crime with a specific firearm or person.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Got a warrant? No. Then fuck off.

      Nemo

      Delete
  3. Comments about the article: Generally I agree with articles wriiten by the Epoch Times; however, in this case and I'll attach a quote here: "The McCloskeys have been waiting since May 4 for 22nd Judicial Circuit Court Judge Joan Moriarty to rule on a motion to return their assault rifle and semi-automatic pistol."

    Please, please, please- Stop referring to his rifle as an Assault Rifle. It's simply an inanimate object known as a rifle or more probable in this instance a carbine! Additionally, by definition a pistol is a semi-auto or autoloading handgun. Why do people, and I'll use that term loosely, use the term Assault Rifle when talking about any auto-loading long gun, an AR-15 carbine/rifle in particular, and not call a pistol an assault pistol since they both eject spent rounds and load live rounds using the same "basic" mechanical operation? Answer, only FBI and other coproach types have "assault pistols!"

    BTW, I loudly applaud the collective state of Missouri for telling the Feral Burros and Incompetents to go play with their little diks elsewhere. Rant off!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Additionally, by definition a pistol is a semi-auto or autoloading handgun."

      Not hardly. If you'll take just one minute and do a little research into news articles from the 1800s, you'll see reference after reference to pistols long before autoloading handguns were even invented.
      Also, in that same time period, Mexicans referred to their revolvers as Pistolas and the term for gunman was pistolero.
      So no, pistols by definition are not auto-loading handguns.
      Rant off!

      Delete
    2. I think you missed my broader point on this article by focusing on historical pistols (as you referenced in your obscure 1800 newspaper articles?) that are not commonly carried nor referenced in today's literature, eg: wheel locks, flint locks, single or multi shot rim and centerfire, and even bolt operated pistols. Both you and I know that a revolver does not now, nor has it ever met the definition for a pistol since it's chamber is separate from it's barrel... whatever the Mexicans called them, notwithstanding. However, you are correct in that single shot handguns, (Thompson) immediately comes to mind fit the current technical definition for a pistol. These might be relatively common for sporting events and hunting, but are not typically carried by cops or citizens for self defense.

      Delete
    3. I caught the broader part of your comment. What you didn't catch was the fact that I wasn't talking about flintlocks or wheellocks, I was talking about single action revolvers which are still commonly carried today. If you'd have taken that minute to do a little research, you'd have realized that.
      Also, the earliest reference I can find that meets your definition of a pistol as far as the chamber being an integral part of the barrel is from the ATF in the Gun Control Act of 1968. Of course they're the same agency that claim a bump stock or FRT trigger is a machine gun, so you can see why I'm tossing that shit right out the window.

      Delete
    4. I never found the Mexican newspaper article that you quoted earlier, but as I suspected the common usage to the Spanish term "pistolero" predates your phantom "siglo 19th" Mexican newspaper as well as the invention of the "single action revolver." And, unlike you, I'll include a courtesy copy for your reading pleasure. Take a moment and absorbed the material:
      "pistolero (n.)
      1937, "gunman, gangster," in a Spanish or Spanish-American context, from Spanish, so called from the name of the weapon (compare pistolier).

      Entries linking to pistolero
      pistolier (n.)
      also pistoleer, "one who uses a pistol, soldier armed with a pistol," 1570s from obsolete French pistolier, from pistole (see pistol). Anything I could add would be another another waste of my time. Adios vato!

      Delete
    5. Huh? What Mexican newspaper article did I quote?
      You're tweekin' huh?

      Delete
  4. So why is the FIB fucking around in what is normally the ATF's bailiwick?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is not the fbi nor atf's balliwick to check on concealed carry permits in any state. None of their f@&king business....just more feral attempts at control.

      Delete
  5. While it's nice to see the Feebs get their ears boxed, the Missouri DOJ and sheriffs have a lot to answer for recently. They've been finally closing down foster facilities for children that have had a long, well-known history of abuse and even trafficking of children while being run by some truly nasty reptilian people. It was known about, but nothing was done. For a long time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The word "No" still has power, especially when they know they don't have a leg to stand on.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.