Pages


Friday, November 18, 2022

The plot thickens...

Swedish prosecutors on Friday announced that "traces of explosives" were found at the leaks in the Nord Stream gas pipelines, and were the result of "gross sabotage."

14 comments:

  1. Semtex or see four?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If they found enough evidence to know it was exposives, then they already know which explosive(s) was/were used. The fact that they haven't said tells me that its one of their country's military allies.

      Delete
  2. Well color me shocked.
    Shocked, I say.......

    Leigh
    Whitehall, NY

    ReplyDelete
  3. no doubt an old WW2 mine that was drifting around and just happened to detonate above the pipeline

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nothing to see here. Move along.
      Just like the suicide of a Russian Colonel who was involved with planning the Ukraine invasion who recently went into his office and shot himself in the chest five times, using four different guns.
      I wonder how he was connected to the Clintons?
      John in Indy

      Delete
    2. Twice. You forgot "twice" -- happened to two different pipelines, hours apart. ;)

      Delete
  4. There is evidence that the Brits did it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Little late for playing the blame game. Its gunna be a cold fookin winter for Europeans. Wonder how many will die because of this shit. And its not like they are allowed to go out and cut down trees to heat their dwellings. Well in the Eastern areas, the Hicksville say BiH, Montenegro, Serbia sure, but Germany, France, no way.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Didn’t Liz Truss give the US the message.....????

    “....."It's done" iPhone message allegedly sent by
    UK's then-prime minister Liz Truss to the US secretary
    of state moments after the sabotage attacks against the Nord Stream network....”

    Ed357

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bullshit. No way in hell they found traces of any explosive down there. The currents have had too much time to wash it away, as well as that much time attacked by the solvent action of the water. If this would have been a detonation on land,...sure,...I could buy that there were remnant traces to be detected. And that's where the science has been developed for detection of trace elements. But there is ZERO background of subsurface aquatic explosives evidentiary forensics anywhere on the fucking planet. This declaration is entirely invented.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Color me doubtful as well.
      But at this point, what difference does it make?

      Delete
  8. “But there is ZERO background of subsurface aquatic explosives evidentiary forensics anywhere on the fucking planet. This declaration is entirely invented.”
    Aesop

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.