More than 300 undercover Los Angeles police officers filed legal claims against the city and police department Tuesday after their names and photographs were released to a technology watchdog group that posted them online.
Other criminals have their mugs posted on-line, so why not these well armed criminal gang members also. When the law has become multi-tiered and enforcement is selective depending upon politics then there's no reason to revere it.
"Undercover"- A liar lying about who he is and what he is doing. The word of a liar should never be trusted. The danger from a lying government employee is greater than any "crime" they are preventing. All government employee records should be open public record. If you want to live off the tax payers, we have every right to know who you are and what you are doing.
"Democrats, supporting your criminals 7*24. Vote for us".
ReplyDeleteOther criminals have their mugs posted on-line, so why not these well armed criminal gang members also. When the law has become multi-tiered and enforcement is selective depending upon politics then there's no reason to revere it.
ReplyDeleteDemocrats wanted them outed because they were investigating a kiddy sex ring.... too many of them were in on it.
ReplyDeleteExile1981
"Undercover"- A liar lying about who he is and what he is doing. The word of a liar should never be trusted. The danger from a lying government employee is greater than any "crime" they are preventing.
ReplyDeleteAll government employee records should be open public record. If you want to live off the tax payers, we have every right to know who you are and what you are doing.
Where there are secrets in government, there is a loss of liberty.
Deletepublic servants, public payroll, public benefits, they are accountable to the public.
ReplyDeleteAlso, California CCW license holders would like a word with the Attorney General after being outed a couple of days after the Bruen decision.
ReplyDeleteSo the agent provocateurs are complaining because they will no longer be able to incite crimes? I fail to see the problem.
ReplyDeleteSteve