Pages


Wednesday, March 20, 2024

Maine mass shooter's guns should have been seized weeks before, report finds

LEWISTON, Maine - Robert Card, the man who killed 18 people in shootings at a bowling alley and bar in Lewiston, Maine, should have had his guns seized weeks before the mass murder, a new independent report concludes.

14 comments:

  1. Say the line, Bart! "He was known to law enforcement".....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL! Exactly!
      I know, lets pass MORE LAWS that won't be enforced properly so that criminals can continue to own and use guns while law-abiding citizens find themselves restricted and put into dangerous situations!
      It's all so inverted at this point, I have concluded it HAS to be the work of the devil. No for real, like it's not just that everything's fucked up (because it is), everything is INVERTED, like diametrically opposite, as detailed in the bible. Good is bad, Men are Women, it's not just messed up, it's INVERTED. That's Satanic, not just evil.
      I wasn't sure I believed all that hubba-baloo before, having been indoctrinated to believe Darwinism through public schooling, but after seeing the specific inversion of everything we've been witnessing the last couple years - it's The Devil, he's real, and all the trappings that go along with it, too (e.g. there is a God as well!)

      Delete
    2. That bullshit might as well read
      “The Down’s syndrome kid across the street knows where the car is”

      TMF Bert

      Delete
  2. "should have had his guns seized".
    There is a slight misunderstanding here: EVERYBODY else's guns need to be seized, especially those from responsible citizens.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Someone stuffed up and some people got shot, not good

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They didn't stuff up, they allowed this to happen. Because it pushes forward the narrative that 'more laws' are needed, i.e., this wouldn't have happened if there were 'more laws'.
      Of course that's a crock of BS.

      There already are plenty of laws. Too many laws, in fact.
      They just aren't enforced, or very selectively.
      Too, by their very definition, criminals do not abide or obey the law.
      Laws are for the law abiding only. More laws are for thise who haven't acted unlawfully.
      More laws = less liberty.

      Then there is the gun. It fits the narrarive to separate the criminal and the gun. The gun is charged with the unlawful act. The gun is guilty. Therefore, the evil gun must be put away, inaccessible to citizens.

      Of course a citizen without means to defend against harm or tyranny is the objective.
      The comment by Rick T alludes to the usual course that authorities knew of the shooter, that they suspected him of nefarious intent, but did nothing to intervene.
      This has become so commonplace that it is the subject of memes.

      No one stuffed up, it was business as usual. And people paid for it with their lives. And society as a whole is degraded and demoralized.

      There is the real objective; to so demoralize a people that they welcome their oppressive benefactor. The mask of benefactor is discarded.

      Delete
    2. Citizens without the means to defend themselves aren't citizens. They are subjects.

      Delete
    3. So much THIS!^^^^

      Delete
  4. Alphabet Soup involved....

    ReplyDelete
  5. The only way laws will be passed to take the guns away from the law abiding is to have more mass shootings. Do not count on the FBI stopping any since they are in lock step with the commiecrats. I would venture they maybe helping out.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Having worked in an ER in which we had to "get patients into the mental health system"....It ain't easy. Ya, you can say that guns should have been taken away; but as the county DA told me; "putting someone into a mental health facility means that we are taking their rights away..."
    Oh and you can't just snap your fingers and shazam, the person is in custody at a mental health facility. There's an excruciating amount of time between making that decision and a judge signing off on that action.
    Oh, and how is all of that mental health care going to be paid for? In Texas there are only 9 state hospitals that will take indigent folks. And the waiting period for that to happen is weeks; not hours.
    Heh, I've cared for mental health patients in the Er that stayed so long, their symptoms improved and they were able to be discharged back into society. I guess taking meds really does improve a persons attitude and mental health!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You should visit some blue states once in a while. The health inspector can throw your ass in jail indefinitely because of a cough and low grade fever.

      Delete
  7. SO all the more "reason" to take legal law abiding citizens RIGHTS away. The crims don't care, the illegals don't care, the Deamons don't care. ONLY the smelly deplorables fly over hicks care RIGHT ???

    ReplyDelete
  8. We would all be better off if we stopped responding to strawman arguments. Woulda, shoulda, coulda....stop taking these hypothetical baited hooks.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.