Pages


Friday, October 11, 2024

‘Chaos’ – MA Gov. Healey Inks ‘Emergency’ Enactment of New Gun Law

When Massachusetts Gov. Maura Healey signed an emergency enactment of the state’s new gun control law, she was trying to head off a petition drive that would have derailed the new restrictions at least until 2026, according to a report at Mass.live.
Posted by

9 comments:

  1. MichaelOctober 11, 2024 at 5:34 PM

    Tyrants will continue to tyrannize their populations until it becomes impossible to do so. Just ask that Romanian couple, the Ceausescus.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bobo the HoboOctober 12, 2024 at 5:15 AM

    Women by far demand “safety” by violating citizens’ Constitutional rights; they do it for your own good, donchaknow. [

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousOctober 14, 2024 at 9:11 AM

      Women as a species are socialist... The only freedoms they care about specifically benefit them, abortion and divorce laws, otherwise it's all about safety and security..
      JD

      Delete
  3. John the RiverOctober 12, 2024 at 7:06 AM

    "Emergency" The only emergency is in that twatwaddles pants.
    My local gun store here has very little than pump shotguns and lever guns on the shelf. Most gun stores will not survive the years of court challenges it will take to overturn this patently unconstitutional bill.
    NJ had something similar, it took five years.

    ReplyDelete
  4. PoppaGaryOctober 12, 2024 at 11:20 AM

    They should not be allowed to use "emergency powers" to enact laws that are not true emergencies other than the people might want a say. But then it would be up to the fox to change the rules in the hen house. Pox on both parties for this shit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousOctober 12, 2024 at 12:18 PM

    Another waste of money since the Commonwealth will lose at the SCOTUS level. Massholes doing what massholes do.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousOctober 13, 2024 at 10:32 AM

      If they can do it and get away with it for months or years at a time before Supreme Court strikes it down, then what good is the Supreme Court

      Delete
    2. wirecutterOctober 13, 2024 at 11:02 AM

      The Supreme Court can't just hear about something being done and wave their magic wand and make them quit. Cases have to be prepared and then scheduled on their calender.
      The real question is what good is the Supreme Court when they do hear a case and issue a ruling only to have the State(s) just ignore it and do what they want anyway?

      Delete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)