An individual right, the one thing worth defending with one’s life, is a constitutional principle, but not only that, it is an individual responsibility to convey whole and undamaged to future generations. As a people, we have forgotten that we are mere caretakers of these rights, they do not belong to us to use or discard as we find politically pleasing. It was a promise from our founding fathers and maintained all the way until the communist coup against them.
Friday, June 25, 2021
A Commie Has No Reverse
There are Nine Principles of Freedom, all of which were covered in the Bill of Rights as the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution, without which there never would have been ratification. This is how dear these rights are. The fact that there is a fundamental misunderstanding of the definition of a right is purely due to the convenient and purposeful disregard by lawmakers.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Do not misinterpret the Bill of Rights:
ReplyDeleteThe Second Amendment does NOT grant us the right to bear arms. All free people have that right. (Slaves historically do not.)
The Second Amendment denies the government the lawful authority to infringe on our right to bear arms.
This applies to all of the amendments in the bill of rights.
DeleteWell, you say that...
Delete- The Government
Yessir, you are correct!!!
DeleteThat is the proper reading of the words written.
The notion that this type of rifle is legal and that type is not completely misses the point as written. They are ALL legal, it is the Governments attempt at regulating any of them, that is expressley not allowed.
Don't engage in debate about "modern sporting rifles" being neccessary. Any form of arms regulation, is unconstitutional. ARMS, weapons of all shapes, sizes, and flavours. Not certain kinds, and only if you've paid your tax stamp and filed your papers. That is the antithesis of the 2nd ammendment.
ALL of the first 10 amendments are restrictions on the GOVERNMENT not the citizens.
ReplyDeletethis is what our Kenyan Nobel Peace Prize winner called "negative rights"
ReplyDelete