Tuesday, July 11, 2023
Student debt: Why Biden's backup plan may wind up in trouble again at the Supreme Court
WASHINGTON – President Joe Biden's backup plan for delivering student debt relief will likely face legal scrutiny for the same reason his initial plan was knocked down by the Supreme Court, several experts told USA TODAY, raising questions about the administration's ability to deliver on his campaign pledge without buy-in from Congress.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The only legitimate option is: You signed on the dotted line so pay up you little bastards.
ReplyDeleteI wonder if biden was ever going to follow through with this. I think just more of his bullshit. The Supreme Court coming along was his easy out. Now he won't look like the lying bastard that he is and be able to place blame. Two and a half years into his presidency and he was promising this all along? Yes, I'm opposed to paying off student loans and everything the fool has done.
ReplyDeleteMeanwhile, Joe and the Dems get the votes from the little shits and it only costs for the lawyers and judges that are on the payroll anyway.
ReplyDeleteAnd there's always the chance that us people that are fighting this will run out of money for lawyers.
You will. Run out of money, that is. Even satanists like the banksters you serve so dutifully have limitations. Enslaving over 40 million Americans... isn't cheap, or easy. Especially when they're the people who're going to be in charge, shortly. God is good, jubilee is coming. Oh, and I never went to college. Couldn't afford it. Trade school instead. But I'm smart enough to know the jubilee is overdue. Usury is evil.
Delete@Anonymous July 11, 2023 at 9:59 PM
DeleteThat's not very Judeo-Christian, of you.
No, just Christian. And Hebrewist, arguably, since the God of Abraham demanded a universal debt jubilee at least every 7 years (and this was with usury already being very much a deadly sin against God) on pain of eternal damnation...
Delete|
Y'all "pay up you little bastards!" (And you're talking to engineers, lawyers, surgeons, doctors, architects, nurses, and more, by the way. The number of "debt zombies" who accrued that debt studying "gender studies" is vanishingly small, but convenient for y'all's purposes to pretend it's the majority) are on such insanely shaky moral and biblical ground it's incredible.
|
Let me put it plainly: God. Hates. Usury. God hates creditors. There's a reason the prayer is "forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors". It's not a metaphor, it's very literal. But maybe you're eager to explain your position to Jesus at the Final Judgement? "They had to pay their own debts Lord! Personal responsibility!!1!"
"Ah, I see. So you paid your own debt of sin? Someone should have told me I didn't need to die and rise from the grave! Such a hassle."
|
I went to trade school. I have no college debt. But even aside from the insanity of thinking it's wise to leave over half your population under 50 in crippling debt that they acquired at an age where they couldn't get a small loan to start a business, and which they acquired because everyone from their parents to the TV, to their pastors and teachers, said it was the only way to have a good, successful life... setting that madness aside, the biblical argument erases any hypothetical counterargument, for anyone who claims to follow Christ even a little bit.
|
Every Christian nation in history has banned usury, because it was a mortal sin. They made exceptions allowing Talmud following "Jews" (who ignored the Torah/Pentateuch AND the Nevi'im) to give loans in exchange for interest, but even then those nations mandated jubilee periods where debts were absolved, and creditors told to suck it up and deal with it.
|
The real problem with Biden's plan is it didn't go far enough. Ideally we'd have a debt jubilee, with all debts erased, the debt-based economy would collapse, and we'd rebuild a Christian nation. But barring that, a universal erasure of all academic loans is what's called for. And then a blanket ban on them, followed by raiding the universities endowments, as other commenters on similar threads have said.
|
We spent trillions on a useless, wasteful debacle in the desert. Erasing academic debt (where the creditor is literally the government, and the money is imaginary, only existing on a balance sheet) wouldn't actually cost a penny, except for administrative costs and paperwork for rolling it out.
|
Finally, who do y'all think is paying for your social security? Social Security payments come from the people currently working at the time. And the payments are reduced by things like college loan debt, oversimplifying a bit. Eliminating that debt would make the pyramid scheme stable for just a bit longer.
|
So debt jubilees are inherently Christian, help protect your immortal soul, and will help secure Social Security past 2033. And yet it's largely republicans who oppose the concept. *Clicks PowerPoint button, starting slideshow of Republican and occasionally Democrat politicians kissing the wailing wall while wearing yarmulkes* I can't imagine why...
That's a long winded way of saying everything should be free and nobody should be responsible for anything. How very liberal of you.
DeleteWell, I think usurers should be held responsible for their usury, and be executed by impalement...does that make you feel better?
Delete|
No, that is *not* a long way of saying everything should be free. Unless you think King David didn't pay for the cedars from Lebanon that were used in the Temple? No. If you bother to actually read, and not regurgitate the bankster satanist party line while your knee jerks like a good brainwashed plebe, you'll comprehend that it is, literally and quiet clearly, an argument against usury.
|
Which is lending in exchange for interest, or a financial return greater than the amount lended. And God himself hates it, and it's a mortal sin for Catholics (and the equivalent for Orthodox) so... unless you're literally a godless atheist or a satanist yourself, you ain't winning this argument, brother, regardless of how deliberately or unintentionally you misconstrue or misrepresent my points. Usury is as bad, or worse than, murder. It's that simple. Martin Luther agreed with the RC church about it, too, btw. As did John Calvin. It's a terrible sin. No ifs, ands, or buts.
His handlers are having him "do" this crap just so it looks like he wants to "help" the great unwashed masses, while not actually doing a damned thing. Kind of like what he did for all those years he was in congress.
ReplyDeleteThis worthless piece of shit wouldn't even make good fertilizer.
ReplyDeleteCC