The long-awaited rule was hailed by anti-gun groups like Everytown for Gun Safety, Giffords, and Brady United as a way of closing the “gun show loophole” and the “internet loophole.” Anti-gun organizations claim this is a step towards universal background checks, a centerpiece of the Biden Administration’s anti-gun policy.
No private gun sales. That'll go a long way stopping the Bobos from stealing them
ReplyDeleteFuck them.
ReplyDeleteno private gun sales. hahahaha I cant breathe. haha I foresee youtube marathons where guys compete to see how many private gun sales they can complete in an hour
ReplyDeleteI miss the days where guns were posted in the local newspaper in the classified section
ReplyDeleteNow back to court AGAIN to tell the ATF they can't change the laws; they can only change the rules.
ReplyDeleteSomeone take a cluebat and advise Pedo Joe there IS no "Gun show loophole" or "Internet loophole." (But I suspect he already knows that.)
All the better to track you
ReplyDeleteWhat's a winner for the Blue Team! Lets Go Brandon!
ReplyDeletewhen will we have universal id checks for voting? until that time, they can go screw themselves.
ReplyDeleteI've read it. And it contradicts itself. Its as if they had different interns write different sections, or more likely, cut and pasted from the various groups' compaints.
ReplyDeleteOn page 44 (at least on my screen,) they actually used the word "business" in the definitions of "is your purchase and sale of firearms considered a business." I read that sentence, stopped, and re-read it. I then started mentally removing articles, adjectives, adverbs, etc, and got down to "purchase/sale is business if is business" and thought....are you kidding???, what imbecile decided that was a necessary statement, and how did someone that stupid get a job working for the BATFE?
Not that I like the IRS or Commerce Department any better, but surely one of them should be the government department that decides if something is a business, or not, not the BATFE.
"... and how did someone that stupid get a job working for the BATFE?"
DeleteIs that a trick question?
I’ve often thought that there were some AMERICANS working at the BATF. How do you explain the short barreled shotgun as a “firearm” ruling? Where before that you could get 10 years in prison.
DeleteJFM
How they going to know, it's private. Gawd democrats are ignorant.
ReplyDeletePresidential "Executive Orders" apply ONLY to executive branch organizations. They don't apply to private citizens. Nobody else has to even think about it.
ReplyDeleteWRONG!!!!!
DeleteFDR issued an executive order (#6102) "buying back" all privately owned gold, under threat of prosecution, at a set rate. The .gov then revalued the gold to a higher rate after they got it all.
I'm surprised the Dumbass-in-Chief hasn't tried this under some national security reason/bullshit.
State governors ordered churches shut down 3 years ago, and the police were enforcing it.
DeleteI guess that was as legal as FDR "buying back" all the gold that wasn't the .gov's in the first place.
Good catch, DiMaggio.
Commerce Clause.
ReplyDeleteNemo
Too bad Florida has other laws already in place. We don't really care.
ReplyDeleteIf the logic that selling a gun at a gun show means you are in the business of selling firearms, then selling alcohol at a restaurant means it's a bar. That means no longer will anyone under 21 be allowed to legally enter the establishment. I guess I'm cool with that - finally a peaceful meal.
ReplyDeleteI see lots of guns being used as collateral in person-to-person loans in the future.
ReplyDeleteHow can a law that has been in effect for 55 years suddenly have a “loophole”. I always thought a loophole was something that was used to circumvent a law. Private gun sales do not circumvent the 1968 Gun Control Act. I guess they think it’s a loophole because it gets around what they WANT to do.
ReplyDeleteJFM
Fuck that commie. I'll do what I want.
ReplyDeleteI agree with the sentiment, but who's to say the next step won't be to set up a cadre of the ATF equivalent of narcs?
DeleteMaybe that's what all those "IRS" agents are going to do instead of auditing your tax returns.
If you had an actual concern for eliminating ghost guns what’s the one step you wouldn’t take? Eliminating private sales will do more for the creation of countless untraceable firearms than any other move Joe Stupid could have taken.
ReplyDeleteYes.
DeleteThe .gov tried it with alcohol, then dope. Now they're gonna try it with guns.
Does anyone here remember what happened with alcohol and dope?
Except, with booze or dope, unless its a haul big enough for one of Hunter's house partys, the evidence disappears fairly quickly. Not so with with FA. Durable goods 'n all that. With a serial number, it may be traceable to any number of 'guilty' parties....
DeleteXiden is POS crook, fuck him and the rest of them
ReplyDeleteJD
Well, there's no law saying I cant sell a gun case for $600.00 and I'll throw in the gun for free.
ReplyDelete