Pages


Friday, September 01, 2023

Biden’s Proposed Rule Will Eliminate Private Gun Sales

President Joe Biden and the Department of Justice announced a proposed rule to change who will need a federal firearms license (FFL) to sell firearms. 

The long-awaited rule was hailed by anti-gun groups like Everytown for Gun Safety, Giffords, and Brady United as a way of closing the “gun show loophole” and the “internet loophole.” Anti-gun organizations claim this is a step towards universal background checks, a centerpiece of the Biden Administration’s anti-gun policy.

27 comments:

  1. No private gun sales. That'll go a long way stopping the Bobos from stealing them

    ReplyDelete
  2. no private gun sales. hahahaha I cant breathe. haha I foresee youtube marathons where guys compete to see how many private gun sales they can complete in an hour

    ReplyDelete
  3. I miss the days where guns were posted in the local newspaper in the classified section

    ReplyDelete
  4. Now back to court AGAIN to tell the ATF they can't change the laws; they can only change the rules.
    Someone take a cluebat and advise Pedo Joe there IS no "Gun show loophole" or "Internet loophole." (But I suspect he already knows that.)

    ReplyDelete
  5. All the better to track you

    ReplyDelete
  6. What's a winner for the Blue Team! Lets Go Brandon!

    ReplyDelete
  7. when will we have universal id checks for voting? until that time, they can go screw themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I've read it. And it contradicts itself. Its as if they had different interns write different sections, or more likely, cut and pasted from the various groups' compaints.

    On page 44 (at least on my screen,) they actually used the word "business" in the definitions of "is your purchase and sale of firearms considered a business." I read that sentence, stopped, and re-read it. I then started mentally removing articles, adjectives, adverbs, etc, and got down to "purchase/sale is business if is business" and thought....are you kidding???, what imbecile decided that was a necessary statement, and how did someone that stupid get a job working for the BATFE?

    Not that I like the IRS or Commerce Department any better, but surely one of them should be the government department that decides if something is a business, or not, not the BATFE.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "... and how did someone that stupid get a job working for the BATFE?"

      Is that a trick question?

      Delete
    2. I’ve often thought that there were some AMERICANS working at the BATF. How do you explain the short barreled shotgun as a “firearm” ruling? Where before that you could get 10 years in prison.
      JFM

      Delete
  9. How they going to know, it's private. Gawd democrats are ignorant.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Presidential "Executive Orders" apply ONLY to executive branch organizations. They don't apply to private citizens. Nobody else has to even think about it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. WRONG!!!!!
      FDR issued an executive order (#6102) "buying back" all privately owned gold, under threat of prosecution, at a set rate. The .gov then revalued the gold to a higher rate after they got it all.
      I'm surprised the Dumbass-in-Chief hasn't tried this under some national security reason/bullshit.

      Delete
    2. State governors ordered churches shut down 3 years ago, and the police were enforcing it.

      I guess that was as legal as FDR "buying back" all the gold that wasn't the .gov's in the first place.

      Good catch, DiMaggio.

      Delete
  11. Commerce Clause.

    Nemo

    ReplyDelete
  12. Too bad Florida has other laws already in place. We don't really care.

    ReplyDelete
  13. If the logic that selling a gun at a gun show means you are in the business of selling firearms, then selling alcohol at a restaurant means it's a bar. That means no longer will anyone under 21 be allowed to legally enter the establishment. I guess I'm cool with that - finally a peaceful meal.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I see lots of guns being used as collateral in person-to-person loans in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  15. How can a law that has been in effect for 55 years suddenly have a “loophole”. I always thought a loophole was something that was used to circumvent a law. Private gun sales do not circumvent the 1968 Gun Control Act. I guess they think it’s a loophole because it gets around what they WANT to do.
    JFM

    ReplyDelete
  16. Fuck that commie. I'll do what I want.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with the sentiment, but who's to say the next step won't be to set up a cadre of the ATF equivalent of narcs?
      Maybe that's what all those "IRS" agents are going to do instead of auditing your tax returns.

      Delete
  17. If you had an actual concern for eliminating ghost guns what’s the one step you wouldn’t take? Eliminating private sales will do more for the creation of countless untraceable firearms than any other move Joe Stupid could have taken.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes.
      The .gov tried it with alcohol, then dope. Now they're gonna try it with guns.
      Does anyone here remember what happened with alcohol and dope?

      Delete
    2. Except, with booze or dope, unless its a haul big enough for one of Hunter's house partys, the evidence disappears fairly quickly. Not so with with FA. Durable goods 'n all that. With a serial number, it may be traceable to any number of 'guilty' parties....

      Delete
  18. Xiden is POS crook, fuck him and the rest of them
    JD

    ReplyDelete
  19. Well, there's no law saying I cant sell a gun case for $600.00 and I'll throw in the gun for free.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are moderated due to spam, drunks and trolls.
Keep 'em civil, coherent, short, and on topic.