Federal appeals court says there is no fundamental right to change one's sex on a birth certificate
A federal appeals court panel ruled 2-1 on Friday that Tennessee does not unconstitutionally discriminate against transgender people by not allowing them to change the sex designation on their birth certificates.
sex is easily determined by DNA analysis (in 99.9999% of the situations; there are a few anomalies - very few). why not base the answer to whatever questions (gender, genetalia, feelings) arise on DNA analysis?
Changing a birth certificate? You mean fraud and forgery? It's a record. It shows what was, and does so accurately. If it doesn't, it's fraudulent.
Even if I accepted the Transgenderism cultists viewpoints, there's STILL no reason to EVER change a birth certificate. It's what happened, not what is now. To claim that what was isn't in fact true, you're into the realm of Juneteenth and the 1619 project - just straight up changing history to all be lies.
If your fingerprints changed (scaring or whatever) would you insist on changing the fingerprints on your birth certificate? No. Do people who are actually transgender (there are genetic conditions which cause boy children to be born looking female, and if it's surgically corrected before puberty, they can still have children. "Androgen insensitivity syndrome") modify their birth certificates? No, they do not.
Liars wanting license to lie and destroy any record of the truth, that's all.
rethinking the problem: you can change (should you wish to) any current ID to reflect current conditions, but how (under what circumstances) should you be able to change a condition that was present when you were born. If you had a large, fleshy protuberance hanging off the middle of your back when born and the surgeon removed it shortly afterwards, in no way can that change the fact that you were born with a large, fleshy protuberance hanging off the middle of your back. If a person murders someone (there's no question that they did the deed) and is put in prison for 20 years; when they come out they apply to have their record expunged. Huh! Someone please explain this new type of thinking to me: you give someone whatever they want (or they find some organization to sue you broke).
There's always that one brain dead judge.
ReplyDeleteDo you mean to tell me that our US Constitution does not guarantee this basic right that was all the rage in colonial America???
ReplyDelete😂😂😂😂😂
Deletesex is easily determined by DNA analysis (in 99.9999% of the situations; there are a few anomalies - very few). why not base the answer to whatever questions (gender, genetalia, feelings) arise on DNA analysis?
ReplyDeleteChanging a birth certificate? You mean fraud and forgery? It's a record. It shows what was, and does so accurately. If it doesn't, it's fraudulent.
ReplyDeleteEven if I accepted the Transgenderism cultists viewpoints, there's STILL no reason to EVER change a birth certificate. It's what happened, not what is now. To claim that what was isn't in fact true, you're into the realm of Juneteenth and the 1619 project - just straight up changing history to all be lies.
If your fingerprints changed (scaring or whatever) would you insist on changing the fingerprints on your birth certificate? No. Do people who are actually transgender (there are genetic conditions which cause boy children to be born looking female, and if it's surgically corrected before puberty, they can still have children. "Androgen insensitivity syndrome") modify their birth certificates? No, they do not.
Liars wanting license to lie and destroy any record of the truth, that's all.
Xy chromosomes = male
ReplyDeleteXx chromosomes = female
There is no chromosomal designation for gender dyxphoria so no such thing on a birth certificate.
JD
rethinking the problem:
ReplyDeleteyou can change (should you wish to) any current ID to reflect current conditions, but how (under what circumstances) should you be able to change a condition that was present when you were born.
If you had a large, fleshy protuberance hanging off the middle of your back when born and the surgeon removed it shortly afterwards, in no way can that change the fact that you were born with a large, fleshy protuberance hanging off the middle of your back.
If a person murders someone (there's no question that they did the deed) and is put in prison for 20 years; when they come out they apply to have their record expunged. Huh!
Someone please explain this new type of thinking to me: you give someone whatever they want (or they find some organization to sue you broke).